83
Zahra Choudhury |Scarcity as Latent Architecture
Cults often operate like hyper-capitalist enterprises.
They follow a familiar pattern: first, create demand by
selling scarcity, then capture and control the “market”
they manufacture. Consider NXIVM: initially
marketed as an elite self-improvement program
targeting aspirational Hollywood circles, it slowly
morphed into a coercive, hierarchical system centered
on sexual exploitation (Noujaim &Amer, 2022).
Similarly, Aum Shinrikyo began not as an apocalyptic
cult but as a network of yoga and meditation classes
that gradually evolved into one of the most infamous
doomsday sects in modern history (Shupe, 1998). In
both cases, scarcity of meaning, success, or belonging
was monetized and transformed into dependency.
Cults, in this view, are not cultural anomalies but
predictable outcomes of a society where even personal
development is commodified.
The COVID-19 pandemic provided a striking example
of how scarcity can radicalize at scale. As financial
precarity deepened, entertainment vanished, and
reliable information about the virus lagged behind
speculation, online conspiracy movements exploded.
QAnon emerged as a central hub for the convergence
of fear and confusion. Its core narrative—QAnon
adherents believe that “a group of Satan-worshiping
elites who run a child sex ring is trying to control our
politics and media,” and that Donald Trump was a
divinely appointed savior (Roose, 2021, para. 2), was
not only absurd but psychologically functional. It
offered interpretive closure, charismatic leadership,
and a sense of embattled righteousness at a moment
when the world felt uncontrollable.
In the information vacuum, fringe claims proliferated.
Some believers embraced pseudoscientific “cures,”
including drinking bleach to combat COVID-19
(Reimann, 2021), while others subscribed to
outlandish fantasies, such as the belief that President
John F. Kennedy had been kept alive in a futuristic
“med-bed” (Weill, 2022). Despite the incoherence
of these ideas, they coalesced into a potent digital
subculture. What made QAnon even more unsettling
was its structure: it lacked the centralized leadership
typical of cults. Instead, it functioned as a “stand-alone
complex,” radicalizing millions through anonymous
posts from “Q,” whose cryptic messages transformed
digital participation into a ritual of collective decoding.
Participants in this phenomenon expressed deep
sentiments for both Donald Trump and Q, echoing
a parasocial bond that sprawled across the political
spectrum and fringe groups across the internet.
Such cult-like behavior can be a stand-alone complex
that arises through the actions of a radicalized collective
without a central leader, and mass mobilization through
the cybersphere proves to have real-world ripples.
Research indicates that resource scarcity can cause
antisocial behavior (Prediger, Vollan &Herrmann,
2014), and significantly overvalued beliefs and beliefs
of moral superiority may create violent behavior
(Rahman, 2018), creating a dangerous cocktail of
extreme beliefs and actions. In conditions of scarcity,
therefore, cohesive cult-like groups can coalesce around
incomplete ideology, become increasingly insular and
intolerant to external influence, and engage in violent
extremism.
In the contemporary period, the real-world
consequences of scarcity-created cults have been
staggering. The January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol
demonstrated how online radicalization--fueled by
informational scarcity, social isolation, and algorithmic
reinforcement--translates into coordinated offline
violence. Today, nearly 17 percent of Americans still
claim to believe QAnon’s core conspiracy (Roose, 2021).
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS, 2022)
has explicitly warned that this digital radicalization
pipeline poses a serious domestic terrorism threat.
These events show how scarcity primes individuals
for extreme beliefs that harden into identity, creating
a self-sealing social and cognitive bubble immune to
outside influence.
This pattern is not limited to the West. In Japan, QAnon
reemerged as “YamatoQ,” whose adherents engaged
in vaccine theft during the pandemic (Zimmerman,
2020). The assassination of former Prime Minister
Shinzo Abe by a man with deep resentment toward
the Unification Church (a cultic group with political
ties) further demonstrated how scarcity-driven
radicalization intersects with institutional blind
spots. In the wake of this event, the Sasakawa Peace
Foundation (2022) warned of the urgent need for
systemic interventions against cults, emphasizing that
a lack of public awareness and regulation in the postwar
Zahra Choudhury |Scarcity as Latent Architecture
Cults often operate like hyper-capitalist enterprises.
They follow a familiar pattern: first, create demand by
selling scarcity, then capture and control the “market”
they manufacture. Consider NXIVM: initially
marketed as an elite self-improvement program
targeting aspirational Hollywood circles, it slowly
morphed into a coercive, hierarchical system centered
on sexual exploitation (Noujaim &Amer, 2022).
Similarly, Aum Shinrikyo began not as an apocalyptic
cult but as a network of yoga and meditation classes
that gradually evolved into one of the most infamous
doomsday sects in modern history (Shupe, 1998). In
both cases, scarcity of meaning, success, or belonging
was monetized and transformed into dependency.
Cults, in this view, are not cultural anomalies but
predictable outcomes of a society where even personal
development is commodified.
The COVID-19 pandemic provided a striking example
of how scarcity can radicalize at scale. As financial
precarity deepened, entertainment vanished, and
reliable information about the virus lagged behind
speculation, online conspiracy movements exploded.
QAnon emerged as a central hub for the convergence
of fear and confusion. Its core narrative—QAnon
adherents believe that “a group of Satan-worshiping
elites who run a child sex ring is trying to control our
politics and media,” and that Donald Trump was a
divinely appointed savior (Roose, 2021, para. 2), was
not only absurd but psychologically functional. It
offered interpretive closure, charismatic leadership,
and a sense of embattled righteousness at a moment
when the world felt uncontrollable.
In the information vacuum, fringe claims proliferated.
Some believers embraced pseudoscientific “cures,”
including drinking bleach to combat COVID-19
(Reimann, 2021), while others subscribed to
outlandish fantasies, such as the belief that President
John F. Kennedy had been kept alive in a futuristic
“med-bed” (Weill, 2022). Despite the incoherence
of these ideas, they coalesced into a potent digital
subculture. What made QAnon even more unsettling
was its structure: it lacked the centralized leadership
typical of cults. Instead, it functioned as a “stand-alone
complex,” radicalizing millions through anonymous
posts from “Q,” whose cryptic messages transformed
digital participation into a ritual of collective decoding.
Participants in this phenomenon expressed deep
sentiments for both Donald Trump and Q, echoing
a parasocial bond that sprawled across the political
spectrum and fringe groups across the internet.
Such cult-like behavior can be a stand-alone complex
that arises through the actions of a radicalized collective
without a central leader, and mass mobilization through
the cybersphere proves to have real-world ripples.
Research indicates that resource scarcity can cause
antisocial behavior (Prediger, Vollan &Herrmann,
2014), and significantly overvalued beliefs and beliefs
of moral superiority may create violent behavior
(Rahman, 2018), creating a dangerous cocktail of
extreme beliefs and actions. In conditions of scarcity,
therefore, cohesive cult-like groups can coalesce around
incomplete ideology, become increasingly insular and
intolerant to external influence, and engage in violent
extremism.
In the contemporary period, the real-world
consequences of scarcity-created cults have been
staggering. The January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol
demonstrated how online radicalization--fueled by
informational scarcity, social isolation, and algorithmic
reinforcement--translates into coordinated offline
violence. Today, nearly 17 percent of Americans still
claim to believe QAnon’s core conspiracy (Roose, 2021).
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS, 2022)
has explicitly warned that this digital radicalization
pipeline poses a serious domestic terrorism threat.
These events show how scarcity primes individuals
for extreme beliefs that harden into identity, creating
a self-sealing social and cognitive bubble immune to
outside influence.
This pattern is not limited to the West. In Japan, QAnon
reemerged as “YamatoQ,” whose adherents engaged
in vaccine theft during the pandemic (Zimmerman,
2020). The assassination of former Prime Minister
Shinzo Abe by a man with deep resentment toward
the Unification Church (a cultic group with political
ties) further demonstrated how scarcity-driven
radicalization intersects with institutional blind
spots. In the wake of this event, the Sasakawa Peace
Foundation (2022) warned of the urgent need for
systemic interventions against cults, emphasizing that
a lack of public awareness and regulation in the postwar
