Cultic Studies Journal, Vol. 2 No. 1 1985, Page 93
Communication
For parents whose child may be a victim of a cultic relationship, effective communication
demands four types of skills: (1) listening, (2) saying what one means (3) controlling
emotions, and (4) thinking of methods to overcome communication barriers.
Listening. Most people don‘t realize that listening is a still. They mistakenly believe that
listening merely means not interrupting, or hearing what another says. But effective
listening entails much more than that. It also involves understanding unspoken or garbled
messages, clarifying messages received from the other person, empathizing with the
emotional aura surrounding many messages, and helping the other person express himself
more accurately and completely. The message Intended often differs from the message
received.
Consider an example. A child comes home and enthusiastically tells his father that the
Divine Light Mission group he Is associating with is teaching him to hear divine music by
sticking his fingers in his ears. fits father may listen calmly to the story, refrain from
interrupting, and be able to repeat everything word for word. However, as soon as his son
finishes, father snaps, ―All you‘re hearing is the blood rushing through your ears!‖
Although the father‘s explanation may be correct, his listening skills need improvement. He
ignored the emotional aura surrounding his child‘s report. His son is excited about this
group. Perhaps he has been lonely and now feels accepted. Perhaps their talk of divine
music and other spiritual matters makes him feel special, or gives him a good excuse for
avoiding life challenges that are causing him difficulty. Moreover, the father‘s response
probably would elicit a defensive reaction in his child (―He‘s calling me stupid again!‖),
thereby closing off further communication rather than facilitating it.
The father should have put aside his scientific critique and concentrated on bringing out the
unarticulated thoughts and emotions that energized his son‘s brief lecture on divine music.
Father might merely have said, ―You seem pretty excited about this group.‖ Such a
statement would have communicated, ―I hear and respect the emotion that motivated you
to tell me about divine music. Tell me more.‖ At an appropriate time, father might have
added something like, ―Have you considered other explanations for your experience?‖
Through a kind of Socratic dialogue, father might then have helped his son realize that the
sound in his ears need not necessarily be divine music. If the group could be wrong about
that claim, it could be wrong about others.
By expressing a nonthreatening interest, father could have created an opportunity to collect
information about the group and his son‘s relationship to It, as well as to offer opinions that,
coming in a respectful context, would be more likely to be greeted with openness and
respect. This is not manipulative. It is, instead, what good listening is all about. A good
listener doesn‘t leap to conclusions. He listens much more than he lectures.
Saying what one means. Parents should not only strive to understand what their child is
trying to communicate (implicitly and explicitly) they should also endeavor to ensure that
their child understands what they are trying to communicate. They should not assume that
because they have spoken, their child has understood.
Parents may not clearly express their intended meaning. In the example cited above, father
may intend to draw out his son‘s feelings and explore the emotional aura the son‘s
statement. If, however, father says ―Why do you like this group so much?‖ instead of, ―You
seem pretty excited about this group,‖ he may fail to achieve his objective, because his son
may mistakenly infer that the ―why‖ question really means, ―How the hell can a supposedly
intelligent person like such a weird group?‖ The message intended is not the message
received.
Cultic Studies Journal, Vol. 2 No. 1 1985, Page 94
Parents may also obscure their intended message with tangential issues, which can
sometimes be destructive to the communication process. Father, for example, might say,
―You seem pretty excited about that group, just like Jeff (older brother) when he joined the
fraternity.‖ Jeff‘s having joined a fraternity is irrelevant to drawing out the son‘s feelings. It
may, in fact, be destructive, e.g., because the DLM son thinks that joining a fraternity is
dumb and resents his father‘s comparison.
Parents may neutralize their intended message by nonverbally communicating a message
that contradicts the verbal message. Thus, father may say, ―You seem pretty excited about
that group,‖ while he taps his fingers on the table, a signal which the entire family
interprets as, ―I‘m angry.‖ The DLM son may interpret these contradictory messages as
saying, ―I challenge you to justify your excitement about that group.‖ The son may then
prepare to do battle, rather than communicate.
Obviously, these illustrations are simplified. Communicating effectively is much more
difficult than most people realize. Therefore, parents experiencing conflict with a child
should be open to studying the communication process, either by reading or by getting
professional help, e.g., participation in communication workshops and/or family counseling.
Controlling emotions. It is a truism that life would riot be worth living without emotion. But
sometimes emotion can get in the way, especially in conflict situations.
Lisa has been attending weekly meetings of a group that worships an Indian guru. Her
mother reads a magazine article about cult leader, Baghwan Sri Rajneesh, an Indian guru
who advocates free love. Knowing nothing about Indian gurus, mother assumes that a guru
is a guru is a guru.
Images of a promiscuous, pregnant daughter begin to dance about in her mind.
Her heart palpitates, her hands shake, ―Oh my god! Lisa‘s in a cult!‖
Mother spends the afternoon worrying about Lisa, imagining all kinds of catastrophic
scenarios. Lisa comes home for supper, mentally exhausted by a difficult organic chemistry
exam in the pre-med program in which she is enrolled. Unknown to mother, Lisa hasn‘t
thought about the guru (who advocates chastity) for days, doesn‘t find him appealing, and
is even losing interest in the fellow who brought her to the meetings in the first place. Lisa
is more concerned about getting into medical school. Mother, who has always been a
―nervous‖ type, mows down Lisa with a volley of accusations and demands that she stop
attending the meetings.
Now, let‘s assume that Lisa is not easily ruffled, sincerely loves her mother, and has good
insight into the communication process. Lisa may sigh, think to herself, ―What in the world
has gotten into mother now?‖ and, in an attempt to understand mother‘s garbled message,
say, ―Mom, tell me what‘s upsetting you.‖ Thanks to Lisa‘s patience and understanding,
mom, after letting it all out, comes to realize that Lisa is in no danger. False alarm, no great
harm done.
Now suppose that Lisa is insecure and resentful about having to live at home. Her reaction
to mother‘s barrage would probably be much different. A fight would erupt. Lisa would tell
mother not to try to run her life. Mother would interpret Lisa‘s emotionalism and irrationality
as a sure sign that she is in a cult and brainwashed. Mother‘s fear and Lisa‘s resentment
would grow. False alarm, much harm done.
Consider another example. Rhonda belongs to an obscure shepherding group that is clearly
a destructive cult. Her shepherd took all her money and ordered her to drop out of school,
cut off communications with her friends, and not see her parents. Through an acquaintance,
she receives news that her younger sister, Sandy, has Hodgkins disease. Rhonda disobeys
her shepherd and comes home to visit, terrified that God will punish her for this
Previous Page Next Page