Cultic Studies Journal, Vol. 2 No. 1 1985, Page 90
Figure I
A Two-Dimensional Classification of Social Influence Processes
Open/Respectful
Inspiration Personal Development
Quadrant Quadrant
Group-Centered-Goals-------------------------------------------Person-Centered Goals
Exploitation Caretaker
Quadrant Quadrant
Extremely Manipulative
The vertical dimension of Figure 1 represents a continuum of methods of influence. On one
end is total honesty and respect on the other end is extreme manipulation (i.e., the regular
use of tactics such as extensive control of information, deception, group pressure,
denigration of critical thinking, induction of guilt and anxiety which can only be relieved
through conformity, physical and/or psychological debilitation, and the induction of trance-
like states).
The horizontal dimension represents a goal continuum. The goal of the interaction can vary
from completely person-centered (i.e., aiming to help the influences achieve his goals or
needs) to completely group-centered (i.e., aiming to induce the influences to forswear his
personal goals or needs for those of the influencer).
The intersection of these two continua forms four quadrants, which are labeled in the figure.
In the self-development quadrant, the influencer uses open, respectful methods to fulfill the
goals or needs of the influences. In the caretaker quadrant, manipulative methods are used
to fulfill the goals or needs of the influences. In the inspiration quadrant, open, respectful
methods are used to induce the influences to sacrifice personal goals or needs for those
targeted by the influencer. And in the exploitation quadrant, manipulative methods are used
to persuade the influences to fulfill the influencer‘s goals or needs.
In our society, ethical influence Is usually confined to the self-development and inspiration
quadrants, in which typical. influencers might be psychotherapists and clergy, respectively.
Cultic Studies Journal, Vol. 2 No. 1 1985, Page 91
Caretaker and exploitative relationships, however, are sometimes appropriate. Using
manipulative, behavior-modification methods to treat the mentally retarded, for example, is
often an acceptable caretaker mode of influence. Exploitative relationships may sometimes
be acceptable (e.g., undercover police work), but usually are, at best, merely tolerated
(e.g., shady sales practices), sometimes within legally defined boundaries (e.g., consumer
protection laws).
In the caretaker and exploitation quadrants, one finds cultic relationships, which, according
to Margaret Singer, are ―those relationships in which a person intentionally induces others
to become totally or nearly totally dependent on him or her for almost all major life
decisions, and inculcates in these followers a belief that he or she has some special talent,
gift, or knowledge‖ (Singer, in press). Hence, if one enters into an inappropriate caretaker
relationship (e.g., a therapist with a relatively well functioning client) or an exploitative
relationship and exacerbates one‘s ethical transgression by carrying the relationship to a
point where one is running another‘s life, one has established a cultic relationship. Although
in extreme cases, existing laws permit some redress, our society, for the most part,
tolerates such relationships in the interest of preserving freedom. (There have, however,
been unsuccessful attempts to extend state regulation in this area, e.g., a conservatorship
bill in the state of New Jersey, c.f., Jersey conservatorship bill draws support, criticism, The
Advisor, April/May 1983).
Because of our society‘s toleration of such cultic relationships, cultists‘ parents will often feel
much anger and frustration. They are angry because they see their child being exploited
they are frustrated because they feel helpless to do anything about it.
Whether or not society should pass legislation extending state regulation over cultic
relationships is not a concern of this paper (see Delgado, 1984, Luckstead &Martel, 1982
and Robbins, Shepherd, &McBride, in press, for discussions of legal issues). The paper
attempts, instead, to offer suggestions on how parents can respond constructively, given
the existing legal and ethical context.
This legal/ethical context bears on the parents‘ actions, as well as their evaluation of the
cult‘s behavior toward their child. Involuntary deprogramming, for example, poses serious
legal risks (as well as ethical questions), regardless of how justified it may seem to parents
who consider it. In addition, one would have to question the ethical propriety of parents‘
resorting to manipulative techniques of influence merely to alleviate their own anxiety, e.g.,
because their child‘s behavior embarrasses them. Although less dubious, the establishment
of a caretaker relationship with an adult child would also tend to arouse suspicion, even
though it may. sometimes be appropriate.
The suggestions made in this paper tend to fall in the self-development quadrant in that the
parents‘ behavior would tend to be open, respectful, and concerned with the child‘s well-
being. A sense of manipulativeness may enter the relationship, but this is usually because
an appropriate resolution of the conflict between parent and child demands self-control and
deliberation on the parents‘ part. They may, for example, sometimes find it necessary to
have hidden agendas. The level of manipulativeness they may need to employ, however, is
relatively low. Furthermore, assuming that their child is, in fact, the victim of a cultic
relationship, a moderate caretaker mode is justified because a) the cultist‘s autonomy and
judgment have been diminished, b) the cultist is harmed by the cultic relationship, and c) a
person‘s family traditionally has more ethical latitude in social influence processes involving
him than do persons from outside the family.
In conclusion, if they want to maintain their ethical bearings, parents should continually
monitor the ethical propriety of their actions. They should avoid using manipulative
techniques of influence In order merely to fulfill their goals or needs. And they should make
Previous Page Next Page