beginning and the numerous interactions
between Jesus and the needy or oppressed found
in the gospels. In another 1972 sermon, Jones
listed the forms that some of these interactions
took: “he loved without respect of race or creed,
he fed the hungry and clothed the naked, he took
in the stranger, and he went into the prison when
someone was standing up for their rights” (Q
1054, part 3). In addition to those who were poor
or hungry, Jones understood Jesus as seeking out
those who were otherwise untouchable or
politically incorrect. According to Jones, Jesus
was “out with the drunks, out with the harlots,
out in the red light district in the back alleys,”
locales that caused his opponents to label him
with demeaning titles, such as a drunkard (Q
1058, part 2). In another recording, Jones set the
drunks and harlots against established
government, claiming he would rather “be an
outright harlot and drunk” than be part of a
government that tried to substitute itself for the
socialistic message surrounding Jesus and the
principle of socialism (Q 1058, part 4). With this
interpretation, Jones drew or implied parallels
between Jesus’s origins and key demographics
and his own life. Jones often portrayed his father
as a negative or absent figure in his childhood,
and the fringe of society was in large part the
target audience of Jones’s message.15
Jones understood these forays by Jesus onto the
“wrong side of the tracks” as building the
Kingdom of God on earth. The Kingdom was
not something to be realized fully after death or
in some future scenario, but rather something
that could be present within everybody and
embodied upon the earth in the present. This
placement of the Kingdom—on earth, in this life
—is crucial to understanding much of Jones’s
other teachings on Jesus and his apparent
conception of the Temple’s purpose.16 Jones
15 Moore (2009, p. 10) gives a succinct and standard definition of
Jones’s father. Descriptions of James Thurman Jones usually touch
on his disability as the result of being wounded in World War I, his
inability to hold down a job, and his emotional distance from his
wife and son. Jones referred to his father as “a Ku Klux Klan
bandit” in Q 1057, part 2, and describes the illness and cynicism of
his father in Q 134.
16 Note that Willey (2013) attributes the Jonestown mass
murder/suicides partially to the Temple’s “religious belief in the
afterlife” (p. 56). As I go on to show, Jones was far more interested
in criticizing the myth of a heaven or an afterlife than in promising
once stated that Christians told people, “you’ve
gotta go to heaven to be perfect…. And that’s
the biggest cop-out in the world” (Q 932). Jesus
himself chastised those who looked to another
world or life for the Kingdom: “[Jesus said,]
‘I’ve had enough of your praying.’ He said, ‘I’ve
had enough of looking up.’ He said, ‘Look
within.’ The Kingdom of revolution, the
Kingdom of your hope is within” (Q 1057, part
5). Temple members could realize the perfection
of the Kingdom of God fully in the present, and
Jesus’s acts pointed to this immanence. To prove
this point, Jones quoted the Lord’s Prayer,
explaining that Jesus prayed, “Thy kingdom
come, Thy will be done [o]n earth” (Q 932 also
Q 1057, part 5). In another sermon, Jones asked
his congregation, “When are we gonna wake up
and get our mind off of… heavenly slippers or
the pearly white city—when are we gonna get
our mind off that stuff and start building our
heaven down here?” (Q 1057, part 4). A sharp
dichotomy between true believers (Temple
members who worked hard to build heaven on
earth) and capitalists, Christians, defectors, or
racists (who hampered the Temple’s efforts or
saw divine intervention as the only catalyst to
cause change) sprang up with this notion of the
Kingdom of God. Eventually these defectors and
other opponents would threaten the existence of
Jonestown itself, signaling that not even in the
present—much less in life after death—could
Temple members find respite from racism and
political oppression. Jones had long before
his followers otherworldly rewards or respite from persecution. A
good summary of Jones’s dismissal of an otherworldly solution to
the problems of humans occurs in Q 953. After asking a series of
rhetorical questions about heaven (“You been there lately? ...
Anybody seen heaven? ...Anybody seen Gabriel? ...Anybody seen
mother Mary?”), he explains that “heaven is within you,” and later
states that “heaven is on earth. That’s the only heaven you’ll find.”
During the mass murder/suicides, Jones does refer to another, or a
next “plane” of existence beyond the present one but these
references occur in the context of his trying to placate hysterical
members (Q 042). Rather than an exposition of doctrine, Jones
invokes the concept of planes to show the Temple members that
“death is not a fearful thing” and “there’s nothing to death” (Q
042). The most interesting comment by Jones regarding life after
death during the mass murder/suicides is a comment he makes
about reincarnation—answering Christine Miller with “maybe the
next time [in a subsequent life] you’ll get to go to Russia. The next
time ‘round” (Q 042). Jones touched on the topic of reincarnation
with some frequency in his preaching although space prohibits
dealing with it in this article, a discussion of reincarnation would
be important to further attempts to piece together Jones’s
(religiously oriented) teachings.
38 International Journal of Cultic Studies ■ Vol. 6, 2015
abandoned the Christian concept of a Kingdom
of God however, in Jonestown, he nonetheless
painted the impending dismantling of the
compound in biblical terms by quoting from
Matthew 11: “the Kingdom suffereth violence
and the violent shall take it by force” (Q 042).
According to Jones’s interpretation, Jesus’s
ministry built the Kingdom of God in a
countercultural, revolutionary manner that went
against the political order of the first-century
world. Such opposition was not sneaky or
implicit, but overt. To say that Jesus overcame
the sources of marginalization or suffering was
to say that Jesus literally stood up against those
sources (Q 1054, part 3). Jones saw Jesus as
revealing to the sinful their sins and boldly
calling out for change, not only to anyone who
would listen, but also to “the kings of [his] day”
(Q 1054, part 3). The urgent and noticeable
manner of Kingdom-building work that Jesus
did was especially underscored in Jones’s
understanding of Jesus as a savior to be called
upon: “When you know Jesus, you won’t have
much time to get on your knees [to pray]—
you’ll have to pray on the run” (Q 1054, part 3).
In fact, Jones interpreted the action of
revolutionary Kingdom-building as being bound
up in Jesus’s title and identity, explaining,
“Christ in the Hebrew means revolution,” and on
another occasion, “Jesus is a revolution” (Q 965
Q 1057, part 5). In both these statements, Jones
emphasized action and immanence. Truly
understanding the Kingdom-building process in
this model led to zeal and dedication amongst
members. Because the Temple was touted as the
only group interested in or capable of creating
heaven out of America’s hell, members were in
essence forced to throw their resources and
support behind Jones’s antagonistic stance
toward capitalist society or abandon hope for
social change. Even during the Temple’s final
murder-suicide ritual, Jones retained the
language of revolution: “This is a revolutionary
suicide” (Q 042).
According to Jones, this mission of radically
altering the political and economic order of the
day made Jesus’s preaching unattractive and
unpopular. The termination of Jesus’s mission
by crucifixion did nothing to improve the status
of his message. By dying in this manner, Jesus
“seemed to be a loser,” for he was killed by the
very system that he opposed (Q 1059, part 1).
Moreover, Jesus got in trouble with audiences
and authorities because his message brought
moral accountability down upon people. Jones
taught that
when somebody becomes God in the
earth, then they have a moral effect on
people…. They can tell people right and
wrong…. Everybody likes to keep God
out there in the unknown and then
everybody can interpret him…. You got
a different story when God takes himself
a body, when principle becomes flesh
(Q 1035)
Jesus did not intend his message—which many
perceived as that of a loser, drunkard, and self-
styled slave—to comfort an audience or to
endear him to authorities, but to challenge
customs and norms. Similarly, in Jones’s
message, the work of Peoples Temple
destabilized long-held racial or religious beliefs
in American society and caused society to
respond in harmful or persecuting ways.
Jones understood Jesus’s message to be one of
socialism, and he frequently made Jesus and
Jesus’s message synonymous with socialism
itself. Several times in one recording, Jones
made such a connection explicit, relating
socialism to the death and resurrection of Jesus
and the birth of the early church. Talking about
himself, Jones said, “The life that I now live I
live through this great principle, the Christ, the
socialistic principle that was on the day of
Pentecost when it said God is love, and love
means they have everything in common” (Q
1059, part 1). In the same discussion, Jones
linked Jesus and the socialist revolution together
in Jesus’s death: “I’m crucified with Christ,
nevertheless I live. I’ve been crucified with the
revolution” (Q 1059, part 1). Continuing to play
on the death and resurrection language of the
Gospels, Jones stated, “You can’t keep the
Christ idea, the revolutionary idea of socialism,
you can’t keep it in a tomb” (Q 1059, part 1).
These three statements suggest that Jones
understood believing in and practicing Jesus’s
message of a new order as somehow
synonymous with taking part in the death and
International Journal of Cultic Studies ■ Vol. 6, 2015 39
Previous Page Next Page