obstructed her parents’ Christian goals. After her
parents sent David (Scheeres’s brother) and
Scheeres to an abusive Christian reform school,
Scheeres envisioned her mother saying, “Now
it’s just Jake and me and our dedication to God”
(2005, p. 197).
Scheeres argued that this abuse was hypocritical,
considering their Christian beliefs. She stated
that her parents adopted her brothers, David and
Jerome, because “To reject a black baby would
have been un-Christian, a sin. God was testing
them” (2005, p. 19 italics in original). Even so,
Scheeres asserted that her parents mistreated
David and Jerome more than their four other
children. For example, when David asked
whether Jerome would come home for
Christmas after he was charged as a juvenile
delinquent, Scheeres’s mother said, “Of course
not” because she had henceforth excluded
Jerome from the family (2005, p. 142). David
rebelled by throwing his snow pants—an act for
which Scheeres wrote that their father broke his
arm: “My throat constricts and it’s hard to
breathe. What kind of father would do this to his
own son?” (2005, p. 144). Scheeres recalled that
her father only once lunged at her, but that he
frequently beat and physically scarred two of her
brothers (2005, p. 158). As a result, she did not
emphasize forgiveness or love for her parents in
her memoir: “I thank my parents for bringing me
David, but not for the life they gave us” (2005,
p. 353). She provided little to no evidence that
her parents were nonunitary they appeared as
detached parents and hypocritical Christians.
Similarly, Flora Jessop and Mackert narrated
about their fathers’ responsibility for their abuse.
Both authors wrote lovingly about their mothers,
whose actions they attributed to social
circumstance.
Flora Jessop depicted her father volatile and
distant: “Even though he was my father, I’d
never felt comfortable around him. His temper
would flare for no reason, and I’d seen him beat
my brothers—one older, one younger—without
mercy” (2009, p. 10). These feelings worsened
after her father sexually molested and
(beginning when she was age 12) raped her
repeatedly (2009, pp. 11–12, 41). Flora
portrayed that the commonality of this abuse
within the FLDS resulted from opportunity
rather than socially determined actions. Even so,
she craved affection from her father:
Like every child, I wanted to be loved
unconditionally by both my parents.
Even though my father had committed
the worst possible violation of a human
being, I still held out hope that someday
he would repent and love me as a father
should love a daughter. And sick as it
seems, he paid attention to me. To a
neglected child, even bad attention can
feel good. (2009, p. 77)
Flora Jessop’s father never made her feel loved.
Although Jessop recognized momentary guilt
when he first raped her, she portrayed him as a
simple, aggressive, uncaring character whose
actions she left unjustified (2009, p. 46).
Mackert explained a literal desire to “kill my
father” (“a vile man”) because of “A lifetime of
deceit, neglect, and intimidation” (2008, p. 17).
Mackert’s memoir recounts his family memories
through sessions with a therapist geared toward
overcoming murderous intentions. Mackert
portrayed his father as a man who abused his
children without providing a fatherly figure. The
sexual abuse of his sisters was what Mackert
identified as the catalyst behind his hatred
toward his father. Even so, Mackert expressed
how his father treated him: “…my first real
memory: being harshly disciplined by a father
who generally had no time for me.... Father
rarely spoke to me, seldom touched me, and
almost never looked me in the eyes” (2008,
p. 44). Mackert relied on his older brothers
(including his polygamous half-brothers) to fill
roles that he suggested fathers normally fill
(such as providing masculine role models).
Mackert explained that his father’s behavior was
hypocritical. His father was loyal to the FLDS
until his death, but he deviated from many
religious practices (i.e., he drank, smoked, and
married without consulting the priesthood [2008,
pp. 170, 202]). Mackert said that the sexual
molestation of his sisters was especially
hypocritical: “My heart was chilled! How could
he? This was the man who raised me to honor
and revere women because they bring life into
this world. He taught me to respect them and
30 International Journal of Cultic Studies ■ Vol. 6, 2015
parents sent David (Scheeres’s brother) and
Scheeres to an abusive Christian reform school,
Scheeres envisioned her mother saying, “Now
it’s just Jake and me and our dedication to God”
(2005, p. 197).
Scheeres argued that this abuse was hypocritical,
considering their Christian beliefs. She stated
that her parents adopted her brothers, David and
Jerome, because “To reject a black baby would
have been un-Christian, a sin. God was testing
them” (2005, p. 19 italics in original). Even so,
Scheeres asserted that her parents mistreated
David and Jerome more than their four other
children. For example, when David asked
whether Jerome would come home for
Christmas after he was charged as a juvenile
delinquent, Scheeres’s mother said, “Of course
not” because she had henceforth excluded
Jerome from the family (2005, p. 142). David
rebelled by throwing his snow pants—an act for
which Scheeres wrote that their father broke his
arm: “My throat constricts and it’s hard to
breathe. What kind of father would do this to his
own son?” (2005, p. 144). Scheeres recalled that
her father only once lunged at her, but that he
frequently beat and physically scarred two of her
brothers (2005, p. 158). As a result, she did not
emphasize forgiveness or love for her parents in
her memoir: “I thank my parents for bringing me
David, but not for the life they gave us” (2005,
p. 353). She provided little to no evidence that
her parents were nonunitary they appeared as
detached parents and hypocritical Christians.
Similarly, Flora Jessop and Mackert narrated
about their fathers’ responsibility for their abuse.
Both authors wrote lovingly about their mothers,
whose actions they attributed to social
circumstance.
Flora Jessop depicted her father volatile and
distant: “Even though he was my father, I’d
never felt comfortable around him. His temper
would flare for no reason, and I’d seen him beat
my brothers—one older, one younger—without
mercy” (2009, p. 10). These feelings worsened
after her father sexually molested and
(beginning when she was age 12) raped her
repeatedly (2009, pp. 11–12, 41). Flora
portrayed that the commonality of this abuse
within the FLDS resulted from opportunity
rather than socially determined actions. Even so,
she craved affection from her father:
Like every child, I wanted to be loved
unconditionally by both my parents.
Even though my father had committed
the worst possible violation of a human
being, I still held out hope that someday
he would repent and love me as a father
should love a daughter. And sick as it
seems, he paid attention to me. To a
neglected child, even bad attention can
feel good. (2009, p. 77)
Flora Jessop’s father never made her feel loved.
Although Jessop recognized momentary guilt
when he first raped her, she portrayed him as a
simple, aggressive, uncaring character whose
actions she left unjustified (2009, p. 46).
Mackert explained a literal desire to “kill my
father” (“a vile man”) because of “A lifetime of
deceit, neglect, and intimidation” (2008, p. 17).
Mackert’s memoir recounts his family memories
through sessions with a therapist geared toward
overcoming murderous intentions. Mackert
portrayed his father as a man who abused his
children without providing a fatherly figure. The
sexual abuse of his sisters was what Mackert
identified as the catalyst behind his hatred
toward his father. Even so, Mackert expressed
how his father treated him: “…my first real
memory: being harshly disciplined by a father
who generally had no time for me.... Father
rarely spoke to me, seldom touched me, and
almost never looked me in the eyes” (2008,
p. 44). Mackert relied on his older brothers
(including his polygamous half-brothers) to fill
roles that he suggested fathers normally fill
(such as providing masculine role models).
Mackert explained that his father’s behavior was
hypocritical. His father was loyal to the FLDS
until his death, but he deviated from many
religious practices (i.e., he drank, smoked, and
married without consulting the priesthood [2008,
pp. 170, 202]). Mackert said that the sexual
molestation of his sisters was especially
hypocritical: “My heart was chilled! How could
he? This was the man who raised me to honor
and revere women because they bring life into
this world. He taught me to respect them and
30 International Journal of Cultic Studies ■ Vol. 6, 2015
