Cultic Studies Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1997, page 72
increasingly demoralizing atmosphere, and at the same time prepare them for life in a new
system as well” (“Second Thoughts,” 1967, p. 5). Another article warns students that
Many schools now have student counselors who encourage one to pursue higher
education after high school, to pursue a career with a future in this system of
things. Do not let them “brainwash” you with the Devil‟s propaganda to get ahead,
to make something of yourself in this world. Make pioneer service, the full-time
ministry your goal. (“What Influences,” 1969, p. 169)
Members who defy these instructions are not necessarily expelled from the congregation,
but typically lose status among their peers and are seen as being “weak in the faith.” Until
recently, most of the membership did not pursue higher education, and some members
dropped out of high school to pursue preaching work. In recent years WTS has stopped its
wholesale discouragement of higher education and now leaves the decision to the discretion
of the individual. This, of course, does nothing to comfort older Witnesses who sacrificed
their chances for education because of organizational instructions such as those cited above.
Even now, WTS reminds students that “your goal in pursuing an education should not be to
equip yourself for some secular career. Rather, it should be to learn skills that will prove
useful to you in your career as a minister of God” (“Young People Ask: What Can,” 1993, p.
14).
Sacrifice of Personal Health Required
Besides the personal sacrifices involving career advancement, material success, time spent
preaching, and so on, members are commanded to make another sacrifice. They are
required to refuse blood transfusions for themselves and their children, regardless of the
consequences, because Witnesses are taught that God prohibits the intake of blood. At one
time this prohibition extended to vaccinations (Reed, 1993) and organ transplants (WTS
referred to transplants as “cannibalism”) (“Questions from Readers,” 1967). WTS has since
reversed its policy on these issues, although it is unknown how many deaths and disabilities
resulted during the time period these policies were in effect.
The prohibition on blood transfusions, however, even if not having one would lead to certain
death, remains in effect. It is estimated that as many as 1,150 deaths a year worldwide
could be attributed to WTS‟s stance on blood transfusions (Reed, 1993), a figure that over
time quickly outweighs even the Jonestown tragedy, where more than 900 followers of Jim
Jones died. In fact, WTS regularly publishes articles that glorify the deaths of children who
died refusing transfusions (see, for example, “Youths Who Have,” 1994, and “Wyndham‟s
Faith,” 1992).
Any WTS member who has a transfusion or allows their child to have one is punished by
disfellowshipping. Reed (1993) cites one instance where a member was disfellowshipped
while still in the hospital following a blood transfusion. He died several days later, and his
friends and relatives were forbidden to attend his funeral on pain of being disfellowshipped
themselves (pp. 103-104). Clearly, using the threat of disfellowshipping to keep members
from turning to life-saving medical procedures constitutes a very high degree of control
exercised by WTS over a very personal issue in the lives of its members (whether to live or
die if in need of a blood transfusion).
Control of Information
One defining characteristic of a high-control group is the prevention of access to information
that can be interpreted as critical of the group in any way. Jehovah‟s Witnesses receive very
clear instructions about exposing themselves to any kind of information, whether through
written materials or in discussion, that may reveal problems or inconsistencies in WTS. WTS
has a tendency to demonize and dehumanize its critics, as seen in this example:
Cultic Studies Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1997, page 73
Yes, apostates publish literature that resorts to distortions, half-truths, and
outright falsehood. They even picket Witness conventions, trying to trap the
unwary. Hence it would be a dangerous thing to allow our curiosity to move us to
feed on such writings or to listen to their abusive speech!… What would you expect
from the table of demons? (“At Which Table,” 1994, p. 12)
An apostate, by WTS definition, is one who “rebels against God and rejects his truth,” that
is, a person who disagrees with WTS‟s version of “truth” (Watchtower Society, 1971, p. 91).
Another article states that
Some apostates reject teachings or requirements set out in his word. Others
claim to believe the Bible, but they reject Jehovah‟s organization…. True Christians
share Jehovah‟s feelings toward such apostates they are not curious about
apostate ideas. On the contrary, they feel a loathing toward those who have made
themselves God‟s enemies, but they leave it to Jehovah to execute vengeance.
(“Search Through Me,” 1993, p. 19)
Members who choose to leave because of disagreement over doctrine, or who are forced out
of the organization because of nonconformist behavior, are subject to disfellowshipping --a
form of shunning that does not allow any current member to associate with the
disfellowshipped person. The Watchtower states:
Baptized servants of Jehovah who deliberately follow a wicked course and refuse to
change must be viewed as unrepentant and thus unfit for Christian fellowship….
They must be expelled….it removes from their midst one who could exercise a bad
influence on them. It also protects the purity of the congregation.
(“Disfellowshipping,” 1995, p. 25)
If the disfellowshipped person disagrees publicly in any way with WTS teachings, he or she
automatically becomes an “apostate.” Since members are not allowed to associate with
disfellowshipped members, information potentially critical of WTS is handily kept out of
members‟ reach by not allowing them to discourse with former members about their
reasons for leaving the organization.
Shunning as a Form of Control
Disfellowshipping in WTS does not simply bar a person from practicing religious rites, but
also serves to cut the victim off from friends and family, who are not allowed to speak with
that person except, in some cases, to deal with “important family business.” Members are
encouraged to “loath” the individual in question. In personal and professional contacts, the
first author is familiar with a number of cases in which family members --including children,
grandchildren, and parents --have completely shunned a disfellowshipped person for years
she has also experienced this herself.
Members are condemned to suffer this extreme punishment for reasons that include a wide
range of behaviors from adultery and criminal activity, to such things as cigarette smoking,
disagreeing with doctrinal points, celebrating birthdays or holidays, attending another
church‟s services, and accepting a blood transfusion, to name a few. One respondent
expressed a common sentiment, writing, “I was never good enough, if I said the wrong
thing I would be disfellowshipped, I was forced to wear a „mask‟ so none would see how I
really felt.”
Disfellowshipping is a serious and often psychologically devastating punishment. Members
of the congregation are required to treat the disfellowshipped as if they were dead. Lifelong
friends no longer acknowledge former members when they see them on the street. Eye
contact is avoided. Socializing in any form with a disfellowshipped person may lead to
censure and possible disfellowshipping of the current member. The disfellowshipped person
Previous Page Next Page