Cultic Studies Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1997, page 51
those of the wise teacher who causes his students pain and suffering in the short run, so
that in time they may prevail against adversity or develop the qualities needed to succeed
in their quests. We put ultimate faith in this teacher, handing over to him our judgment, our
perceptions, and ultimately our lives. He hitched a ride on the deeply embedded image of
God, an archetype perhaps that we all carry. Our culture has given us only male figures to
occupy that position, and also has exaggerated the analogy of man and God to the extreme
by suggesting that man is God for woman. Despite our conscious efforts to deny this, the
prejudice runs deep in our Judeo-Christian roots and, we believe, contributes in no small
way to the dynamics of coercive control exercised most often by men.
Intuition. Intuition, in the sense of vision and a feeling for truth, represents another
“feminine” quality that was derogated and denied, another quality to which women seem to
have easier access. Intuition serves as a navigational tool, along with anger and bodily
sensing, that contributes to a unique feminine way of knowledge. In our group, intuition
was perhaps the leader‟s strongest suit. A florid visionary, often he would give reports of
spirits‟ visitations to him in dreams or waking episodes. He also took to prophesying,
envisioning events to come. His intuitive ability to size up a person or a situation was also
uncanny and greatly contributed to the exercise of his folk-art form of guruship.
Intuitive vision in members, however, was condemned as imagination or fantasy, a
detrimental state of mind. He discouraged dwelling on visions, classing them as part of
distracting mind activity (much as it is in other mindfulness practices). Only he was
permitted legitimate visions. One of us recently attended a workshop in which we were
asked to visualize a “spirit guide.” No such figure came. Only a plastic, visquine sheeting
appeared like a veil on the field of inner vision, effectively blocking any further sight. We
had internalized a far-reaching program to ignore any perceptions other than the tangible.
This program, of course, built strongly on the one already laid down by our culture, which
rejects the reality of anything imperceptible to the five senses. For some of us, our
attraction to him as an intuitive visionary was an attraction to a projected part of our own
selves, a part with religious sensibilities that found little validation in our families,
classrooms, or jobs. While we had access to the visionary through him, he defined the field
of allowable perception for us and ultimately determined the validity of our perceptions.
Reports of auras or visions would be labeled “the instinctive center” --another derogatory
term, characterizing the body as the chief enemy of awakening. Although he often spoke of
spiritual beings working directly with his followers, he clearly had sole proprietorship of
visionary realms, and so established himself as the direct connection to the Divine.
Conclusion
Though we are loathe to acknowledge this, in our community, both men and women, like
battered women in a scene of domestic violence, lost their judgment and were held by fear.
Robbed of intuition, body knowledge, sexuality, and anger, we were vulnerable to assault of
the worst kind: spiritual and psychological assault. With physical abuse, you register the
blows, see the wounds. You know you have been hit. You know why you ache when you
wake up in the morning. With the more intangible psychological or spiritual assaults, you
don‟t know what‟s happened to you. You have been raped, used --mind-fucked, to use the
coarse but perfectly descriptive term --to cater to a trusted caretaker‟s needs. In the name
of your own good, you have been used to satisfy his drives for pleasure and power over
you, to absorb his smiling, hidden hostility. In this situation, you aren‟t sure why your heart
aches with emptiness, your limbs with exhaustion, and your gut with anxiety. You begin to
carry an unnamed fear.
This is the fear of the battered woman and the dedicated disciple, the fear that keeps you in
thrall to a destructive man. You begin to believe his propaganda with a visceral certainty as
a means of survival. Although anyone outside the circle of your relationship or community
Cultic Studies Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1997, page 52
cannot understand why you don‟t leave him, you fear that if you do, the worst will happen.
With an abusive husband, the fear is of dying --not being able to survive without the man,
or, in some cases, even fear dying at his hands. With a spiritual teacher, it is soul death that
is feared. This is not a rational process, but has roots deep in the mysteries of our
existence. Once you are cut off from your own vital resources for living, you come to believe
you must have your surrogate god‟s support, approval, and reflection to go on. For some,
the attachment appears to be more to the group than the leader, but this, too, disguises the
true situation. Behind the group always stands the leader, whose standards for behavior
must be met for continued acceptance by the group.
***
Many people have commented on the paradigm shift we in the West are going through. We
see this transition taking place in the hearts and minds of individual people, such as
ourselves. We have learned about the vulnerability of the idealistic mind, the unsavory and
irresistible attraction of the delusional charismatic, the dangers of certitude about the great
unknowables --birth, death, meaning, absolute values. While we all yearn for answers to
the basic questions of existence, we now know we must ultimately discover the answers
ourselves. In this age when the foundations of institutions and ways of thinking that have
supported us for 3,000 years are crumbling, we are learning to recognize the signs of the
free fall through space that accompany losing those old certitudes. We can also understand
with what determination the human personality seeks to hang on to these traditions of
thinking, behavior, and feeling. We know why the evangelical Christian movements have
gained force in these times, as well as the “fringe” or “new age” religious movements. These
apparent opposites are startlingly alike and in some ways serve similar purposes in offering
doctrines that answer all questions, grant a sense of superiority over nonbelievers, and
establish instant communities. They also often shut down the at times overwhelming
creative wellsprings of the new times into which we are being catapulted. Some of us have
been challenged through experiences of exploitation and betrayal to open to these scary,
creative forces, to follow their lead without the direction of those who have gone before.
The appeal of the existing traditions is great, the habit of authoritarian thinking well set. For
too long we have felt safe in the tower of ideas and like-minded souls. The experience of
waking to our unwitting captivity, the misuse of our talents to do harm, the dangerous
blinders of belief disguised as critical thought, has thrown us out of the comfortable tower of
doctrinaire safety into the dark night of creative tumult. We hope that someone,
somewhere, in a destructive relationship with another person or a group, someone who is
beginning to see but cannot yet act, will gain a tiny bit of resolve from our shared thoughts.
We encourage you to reach outside the relationship to the perceptions of people who care
about you in the world. Please remember that invisible prisons have the most heavily
fortified walls. If you are in a thought prison, you will need help from the outside to get out.
End Notes
1. We use the masculine pronoun throughout because our experience was with a man
and, anecdotally, most self-appointed leaders seem to be men, although we realize that
the role of perpetrator can be played by either a man or woman.
2. Herman (1992) believes that under stress the threats of the perpetrator become less
veiled. He may then show his tyrannical, desperate side. One woman who openly
continued seeing a friend who had left was told that her action was “criminal” and would
likely be punished by higher forces placing her mother in a car accident. Again, the more
explicit forms of threat were rare. As we look back, when the leader started to make
these threats, his art form was slipping, his methods of control were becoming too
obvious. For some, this obvious coercion made it easier to break the spell, to move
through the confusion and the panic engendered by the fear induction and to leave.
Previous Page Next Page