ISSN: 2710-4028 DOI: doi.org/10.54208/1000/0006 121
Netolitzky, D. (2016a). The History of the Organized
Pseudolegal Commercial Argument
Phenomenon in Canada. Alberta Law Review,
53:3, 609-642.
Netolitzky, D. (2016b). Organized Pseudolegal
Commercial Arguments [OPCA] in Canada:
an Attack on the Legal System. Journal of
Parliamentary &Political Law, 10, 137-193.
Netolitzky, D. (2017). Organized Pseudolegal
Commercial Arguments in Canadian Inter-
Partner Family Law Court Disputes. Alberta
Law Review, 54:4, 955-996.
Netolitzky, D. (2018a). Lawyers and Court
Representation of Organized Pseudolegal
Commercial Argument [OPCA] Litigants in
Canada. UBC Law Review, 51:2, 419-488.
Netolitzky, D. (2018b, May 3). A Rebellion of
Furious Paper: Pseudolaw as a Revolutionary
Legal System. CEFIR Symposium “Sovereign
Citizens in Canada”. http://www.researchgate.
net/publication/325053364_A_Rebellion_
of_Furious_Paper_Pseudolaw_as_a_
Revolutionary_Legal_System
Netolitzky, D. (2018c). Organized Pseudolegal
Commercial Arguments as Magic and
Ceremony. Alberta Law Review, 55:4,
1045-1087.
Netolitzky, D. (2019a). After the Hammer: Six Years of
Meads v Meads. Alberta Law Review, 56:4,
1167-1207.
Netolitzky, D. (2019b). Comment on Y.-M. Morissette,
‘Querulous and Vexatious Litigants as a
Disorder of a Modern Legal System’. Canadian
Criminal Law Review, 24:3, 257-264.
Netolitzky, D. (2021). A Revolting Itch: Pseudolaw as
a Social Adjuvant. Politics, Religion &Ideology,
22:2, 164-188.
Netolitzky, D. (2022). Worn Out Faces: Repeat Self-
Represented Litigants at the Supreme Court of
Canada. UBC Law Review, 55:1, 81-147.
Netolitzky, D. (2023a). The Dead Sleep Quiet: History
of the Organized Pseudolegal Commercial
Argument Phenomenon in Canada -Part II.
Alberta Law Review, 60:3, 795-831.
Netolitzky, D. (2023b). Ten Seconds to Implosion:
the Magna Carta Lawful Rebellion. International
Journal of Coercion, Abuse, and Manipulation.
doi: 10.54208/1000/0006/003.
Netolitzky, D. (2023c). Jesus Built My Strawman: The
Church of the Ecumenical Redemption
International and “minister” Edward Jay Robin
Belanger. International Journal of Coercion,
Abuse, and Manipulation, 3. doi:
doi.org/10.54208/1000/0006/004
Netolitzky, D. &Warman, R. (2021). As the Water
Grinds the Stone: Comparison of Represented
and Self-represented Appellant Populations
in the Federal Court of Appeal. Windsor
Yearbook of Access to Justice, 37, 206-259.
Oberkirsch v The Queen, 2016 TCC 84.
https://canlii.ca/t/gphrs
Peck v The Queen, 2018 TCC 52.
https://canlii.ca/t/hr2j8
Perry, B., Hofmann, D., &Scrivens, R. (2017, August).
Working Paper 17-02: Broadening our
Understanding of Anti-Authority Movements
in Canada. TSAS.
https://www.tsas.ca/wp-content/uploads/
2018/03/2017-02_v2PerryFINAL.compressed.
pdf
Pomerleau v Canada (Revenue Agency), 2017 ABQB
123. https://canlii.ca/t/gxnsd
R c Cardin, 2021 QCCS 930. https://canlii.ca/t/jdvvt
R c Paquin, 2021 QCCS 931. https://canlii.ca/t/jdvvs
R v Branch, [2020] OJ No 2628 (QL) (Ont Ct J).
R v Stancer, 2016 BCSC 192.
R v Watts, 2015 ONSC 5597. https://canlii.ca/t/gl0zz
Netolitzky, D. (2016a). The History of the Organized
Pseudolegal Commercial Argument
Phenomenon in Canada. Alberta Law Review,
53:3, 609-642.
Netolitzky, D. (2016b). Organized Pseudolegal
Commercial Arguments [OPCA] in Canada:
an Attack on the Legal System. Journal of
Parliamentary &Political Law, 10, 137-193.
Netolitzky, D. (2017). Organized Pseudolegal
Commercial Arguments in Canadian Inter-
Partner Family Law Court Disputes. Alberta
Law Review, 54:4, 955-996.
Netolitzky, D. (2018a). Lawyers and Court
Representation of Organized Pseudolegal
Commercial Argument [OPCA] Litigants in
Canada. UBC Law Review, 51:2, 419-488.
Netolitzky, D. (2018b, May 3). A Rebellion of
Furious Paper: Pseudolaw as a Revolutionary
Legal System. CEFIR Symposium “Sovereign
Citizens in Canada”. http://www.researchgate.
net/publication/325053364_A_Rebellion_
of_Furious_Paper_Pseudolaw_as_a_
Revolutionary_Legal_System
Netolitzky, D. (2018c). Organized Pseudolegal
Commercial Arguments as Magic and
Ceremony. Alberta Law Review, 55:4,
1045-1087.
Netolitzky, D. (2019a). After the Hammer: Six Years of
Meads v Meads. Alberta Law Review, 56:4,
1167-1207.
Netolitzky, D. (2019b). Comment on Y.-M. Morissette,
‘Querulous and Vexatious Litigants as a
Disorder of a Modern Legal System’. Canadian
Criminal Law Review, 24:3, 257-264.
Netolitzky, D. (2021). A Revolting Itch: Pseudolaw as
a Social Adjuvant. Politics, Religion &Ideology,
22:2, 164-188.
Netolitzky, D. (2022). Worn Out Faces: Repeat Self-
Represented Litigants at the Supreme Court of
Canada. UBC Law Review, 55:1, 81-147.
Netolitzky, D. (2023a). The Dead Sleep Quiet: History
of the Organized Pseudolegal Commercial
Argument Phenomenon in Canada -Part II.
Alberta Law Review, 60:3, 795-831.
Netolitzky, D. (2023b). Ten Seconds to Implosion:
the Magna Carta Lawful Rebellion. International
Journal of Coercion, Abuse, and Manipulation.
doi: 10.54208/1000/0006/003.
Netolitzky, D. (2023c). Jesus Built My Strawman: The
Church of the Ecumenical Redemption
International and “minister” Edward Jay Robin
Belanger. International Journal of Coercion,
Abuse, and Manipulation, 3. doi:
doi.org/10.54208/1000/0006/004
Netolitzky, D. &Warman, R. (2021). As the Water
Grinds the Stone: Comparison of Represented
and Self-represented Appellant Populations
in the Federal Court of Appeal. Windsor
Yearbook of Access to Justice, 37, 206-259.
Oberkirsch v The Queen, 2016 TCC 84.
https://canlii.ca/t/gphrs
Peck v The Queen, 2018 TCC 52.
https://canlii.ca/t/hr2j8
Perry, B., Hofmann, D., &Scrivens, R. (2017, August).
Working Paper 17-02: Broadening our
Understanding of Anti-Authority Movements
in Canada. TSAS.
https://www.tsas.ca/wp-content/uploads/
2018/03/2017-02_v2PerryFINAL.compressed.
Pomerleau v Canada (Revenue Agency), 2017 ABQB
123. https://canlii.ca/t/gxnsd
R c Cardin, 2021 QCCS 930. https://canlii.ca/t/jdvvt
R c Paquin, 2021 QCCS 931. https://canlii.ca/t/jdvvs
R v Branch, [2020] OJ No 2628 (QL) (Ont Ct J).
R v Stancer, 2016 BCSC 192.
R v Watts, 2015 ONSC 5597. https://canlii.ca/t/gl0zz
