International Journal of Coercion, Abuse, and Manipulation Volume 6 2023 14
Netolitzky, D. (2023e). New Hosts for an Old Disease:
History of the Organized Pseudolegal
Commercial Argument Phenomenon in Canada -
Part III. Alberta Law Review, 60:4 (in press).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
363383261_New_Hosts_for_an_Old_
Disease_History_of_the_Organized_
Pseudolegal_Commercial_Argument_
Phenomenon_in_Canada_-_Part_III
Netolitzky, D. &Warman R. (2020). Enjoy the Silence:
Pseudolaw at the Supreme Court of Canada.
Alberta Law Review, 57:3, 715-767.
Palmer, S. (2010). The Nuwaubian Nation: Black
Spirituality and State Control. (New York:
Routledge).
Palmer, S. (2021). Canada’s “Freemen-on-the-land”:
The Timeless Quest for Gnosis. Wuhan Journal
of Cultic Studies, 1:1, 33-47.
Paradis, C., Owen, E. &McCullough, G. (2018).
Evaluations of Urban Sovereign Citizens’
Competency to Stand Trial. Journal of the
American Academy of Psychiatry &Law,
46:2, 158-166.
Parker, G. (2014). Competence to Stand Trial
Evaluations of Sovereign Citizens: A Case
Series and Primer of Odd Political and Legal
Beliefs. Journal of the American Academy
of Psychiatry &Law, 42:3, 338-349.
Parker, G. (2018). Sovereign Citizens and Competency
to Stand Trial. Journal of the American
Academy of Psychiatry &Law, 46:2, 167-170.
Partridge, C. (2004). The Re-Enchantment of the
West: Alternative Spiritualities, Sacralization,
Popular Culture, and Occulture. (London: T&T
Clark International).
Pomerleau v Canada (Revenue Agency), 2017 ABQB
123. https://canlii.ca/t/gxnsd
Pytyck J. &Chaimowitz, G. (2013). The Sovereign
Citizen Movement and Fitness to Stand Trial.
International Journal of Forensic Mental
Health, 12:2, 149-153.
Rothweiler v Payette, 2018 ABQB 134.
https://canlii.ca/t/hqm2t
Rothweiler v Payette, 2018 ABQB 399.
https://canlii.ca/t/hsp31
Sarteschi, C. (2020). Sovereign Citizens: A
Psychological and Criminological Analysis.
(Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG).
Sarteschi, C. (2021). Sovereign citizens: A narrative
review with implications of violence towards
law enforcement. Aggression &Violent
Behavior, 60:1, 1-11.
Sarteschi, C. (2022, April 19). The Law Doesn’t Apply
to Me: The Spread of the Sovereign Citizen
Movement Around the World. International
Center for the Study of Violent Extremism.
http://www.icsve.org/this-law-doesnt-apply-
to-me/
Sarteschi, C. (2023a). The social phenomenon of
Romana Didulo: “Queen of Canada”.
International Journal of Coercion, Abuse,
&Manipulation, 6.
DOI:10.54208/1000/0006/002.
Sarteschi, C. (2023b). Sovereign Citizens, QAnon,
and Child Protective Services (CPS): Exploring
the Overlaps. International Journal of Coercion,
Abuse, &Manipulation, 6.
DOI: 10.54208/1000/0006/006.
Slater, B. (2016). Sovereign Citizen Movement: An
Empirical Study of the Rise in Activity,
Explanations of Growth, and Policy
Prescriptions. (MA thesis, Naval Postgraduate
School).
https://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/
10945/50485/16Sep_Slater_Brian.pdf
Sullivan, F. (1999). The ‘Usurping Octopus of
Jurisdictional/Authority’: The Legal Theories
of the Sovereign Citizen Movement. Wisconsin
Law Review, 1999, 785-823.
Netolitzky, D. (2023e). New Hosts for an Old Disease:
History of the Organized Pseudolegal
Commercial Argument Phenomenon in Canada -
Part III. Alberta Law Review, 60:4 (in press).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
363383261_New_Hosts_for_an_Old_
Disease_History_of_the_Organized_
Pseudolegal_Commercial_Argument_
Phenomenon_in_Canada_-_Part_III
Netolitzky, D. &Warman R. (2020). Enjoy the Silence:
Pseudolaw at the Supreme Court of Canada.
Alberta Law Review, 57:3, 715-767.
Palmer, S. (2010). The Nuwaubian Nation: Black
Spirituality and State Control. (New York:
Routledge).
Palmer, S. (2021). Canada’s “Freemen-on-the-land”:
The Timeless Quest for Gnosis. Wuhan Journal
of Cultic Studies, 1:1, 33-47.
Paradis, C., Owen, E. &McCullough, G. (2018).
Evaluations of Urban Sovereign Citizens’
Competency to Stand Trial. Journal of the
American Academy of Psychiatry &Law,
46:2, 158-166.
Parker, G. (2014). Competence to Stand Trial
Evaluations of Sovereign Citizens: A Case
Series and Primer of Odd Political and Legal
Beliefs. Journal of the American Academy
of Psychiatry &Law, 42:3, 338-349.
Parker, G. (2018). Sovereign Citizens and Competency
to Stand Trial. Journal of the American
Academy of Psychiatry &Law, 46:2, 167-170.
Partridge, C. (2004). The Re-Enchantment of the
West: Alternative Spiritualities, Sacralization,
Popular Culture, and Occulture. (London: T&T
Clark International).
Pomerleau v Canada (Revenue Agency), 2017 ABQB
123. https://canlii.ca/t/gxnsd
Pytyck J. &Chaimowitz, G. (2013). The Sovereign
Citizen Movement and Fitness to Stand Trial.
International Journal of Forensic Mental
Health, 12:2, 149-153.
Rothweiler v Payette, 2018 ABQB 134.
https://canlii.ca/t/hqm2t
Rothweiler v Payette, 2018 ABQB 399.
https://canlii.ca/t/hsp31
Sarteschi, C. (2020). Sovereign Citizens: A
Psychological and Criminological Analysis.
(Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG).
Sarteschi, C. (2021). Sovereign citizens: A narrative
review with implications of violence towards
law enforcement. Aggression &Violent
Behavior, 60:1, 1-11.
Sarteschi, C. (2022, April 19). The Law Doesn’t Apply
to Me: The Spread of the Sovereign Citizen
Movement Around the World. International
Center for the Study of Violent Extremism.
http://www.icsve.org/this-law-doesnt-apply-
to-me/
Sarteschi, C. (2023a). The social phenomenon of
Romana Didulo: “Queen of Canada”.
International Journal of Coercion, Abuse,
&Manipulation, 6.
DOI:10.54208/1000/0006/002.
Sarteschi, C. (2023b). Sovereign Citizens, QAnon,
and Child Protective Services (CPS): Exploring
the Overlaps. International Journal of Coercion,
Abuse, &Manipulation, 6.
DOI: 10.54208/1000/0006/006.
Slater, B. (2016). Sovereign Citizen Movement: An
Empirical Study of the Rise in Activity,
Explanations of Growth, and Policy
Prescriptions. (MA thesis, Naval Postgraduate
School).
https://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/
10945/50485/16Sep_Slater_Brian.pdf
Sullivan, F. (1999). The ‘Usurping Octopus of
Jurisdictional/Authority’: The Legal Theories
of the Sovereign Citizen Movement. Wisconsin
Law Review, 1999, 785-823.
