International Journal of Coercion, Abuse, and Manipulation Volume 6 2023 120
Grier v Canada, 2017 FCA 129.
https://canlii.ca/t/h4j0z
Haynes v The Queen, 2013 TCC 185.
https://canlii.ca/t/fz7xv
Hoff, G. (2014, February 7). W5: Taxpayers face huge
penalties after bad advice. CTV News.
https://www.ctvnews.ca/w5/w5-taxpayers-
face-huge-penalties-after-bad-advice-1.16
76215
Hogg v The Queen, 2017 TCC 231.
https://canlii.ca/t/hp1qw
Income Tax Act, RSC 1985, c 1 (5th Supp).
https://canlii.ca/t/7vb7
Kalinowski, C. (2019). A Legal Response to the
Sovereign Citizen Movement. Montana Law
Review, 80:2, 1-58.
https://scholarworks.umt.edu/mlr/vol80/
iss2/2/
Khattar v The Queen, 2015 TCC 338.
https://canlii.ca/t/gmpbr
Kim v The Queen, 2017 TCC 246.
https://canlii.ca/t/hph0g
Klotz v The Queen, 2004 TCC 147.
https://canlii.ca/t/1ggjc
Koniak, S. (1997). The Chosen People in our
Wilderness. Michigan Law Review, 85:6, 1761-
1798.
Lauzon v The Queen, 2016 TCC 71.
https://canlii.ca/t/gp0k7
Lavoie v The Queen, 2015 TCC 228.
https://canlii.ca/t/gs0d7
Law Society of Upper Canada v Sumner, 2017
ONLSTH 194. https://canlii.ca/t/h6fs0
Mahdi v The Queen, 2018 TCC 149.
https://canlii.ca/t/ht7r4
Mallette v The Queen, 2016 TCC 27.
https://canlii.ca/t/gn5nf
Mayne v The Queen, 2016 TCC 212.
https://canlii.ca/t/gv9sw
McCarthy v The Queen, 2016 TCC 45.
https://canlii.ca/t/gnds4
McCarthy v The Queen, 2016 TCC 49.
https://canlii.ca/t/gnl58
McCarthy v The Queen, 2016 TCC 86.
https://canlii.ca/t/gphrq
McCoy, J., Jones, D., &Hastings, Z. (2019). Building
Awareness, Seeking Solutions: Extremism &
Hate Motivated Violence in Alberta.
Organization for the Prevention of Violence.
http://preventviolence.ca/publication/
building-awareness-seeking-solutions-2019-
report/
McRoberts, C. (2019). Tinfoil Hats and Powdered
Wigs: Thoughts on Pseudolaw. Washburn Law
Journal, 58:3, 637-672.
Meads v Meads, 2012 ABQB 571.
https://canlii.ca/t/fsvjq
Melnitzer, J. (2016, May 11). Tax Court judge says
CRA needs ‘early warning system’ to protect
taxpayers from scam artists. Financial Post.
https://financialpost.com/legal-post/tax-
court-judge-says-cra-needs-early-warning-
system-to-protect-taxpayers-from-scam-artists
Mior v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 321.
https://canlii.ca/t/hz70p
Mior v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 322.
https://canlii.ca/t/hz70q
Morissette, Y. (2019). Querulous and Vexatious
Litigants as a Disorder of a Modern Legal
System. Canadian Criminal Law Review, 24:3,
265-312.

ISSN: 2710-4028 DOI: doi.org/10.54208/1000/0006 121
Netolitzky, D. (2016a). The History of the Organized
Pseudolegal Commercial Argument
Phenomenon in Canada. Alberta Law Review,
53:3, 609-642.
Netolitzky, D. (2016b). Organized Pseudolegal
Commercial Arguments [OPCA] in Canada:
an Attack on the Legal System. Journal of
Parliamentary &Political Law, 10, 137-193.
Netolitzky, D. (2017). Organized Pseudolegal
Commercial Arguments in Canadian Inter-
Partner Family Law Court Disputes. Alberta
Law Review, 54:4, 955-996.
Netolitzky, D. (2018a). Lawyers and Court
Representation of Organized Pseudolegal
Commercial Argument [OPCA] Litigants in
Canada. UBC Law Review, 51:2, 419-488.
Netolitzky, D. (2018b, May 3). A Rebellion of
Furious Paper: Pseudolaw as a Revolutionary
Legal System. CEFIR Symposium “Sovereign
Citizens in Canada”. http://www.researchgate.
net/publication/325053364_A_Rebellion_
of_Furious_Paper_Pseudolaw_as_a_
Revolutionary_Legal_System
Netolitzky, D. (2018c). Organized Pseudolegal
Commercial Arguments as Magic and
Ceremony. Alberta Law Review, 55:4,
1045-1087.
Netolitzky, D. (2019a). After the Hammer: Six Years of
Meads v Meads. Alberta Law Review, 56:4,
1167-1207.
Netolitzky, D. (2019b). Comment on Y.-M. Morissette,
‘Querulous and Vexatious Litigants as a
Disorder of a Modern Legal System’. Canadian
Criminal Law Review, 24:3, 257-264.
Netolitzky, D. (2021). A Revolting Itch: Pseudolaw as
a Social Adjuvant. Politics, Religion &Ideology,
22:2, 164-188.
Netolitzky, D. (2022). Worn Out Faces: Repeat Self-
Represented Litigants at the Supreme Court of
Canada. UBC Law Review, 55:1, 81-147.
Netolitzky, D. (2023a). The Dead Sleep Quiet: History
of the Organized Pseudolegal Commercial
Argument Phenomenon in Canada -Part II.
Alberta Law Review, 60:3, 795-831.
Netolitzky, D. (2023b). Ten Seconds to Implosion:
the Magna Carta Lawful Rebellion. International
Journal of Coercion, Abuse, and Manipulation.
doi: 10.54208/1000/0006/003.
Netolitzky, D. (2023c). Jesus Built My Strawman: The
Church of the Ecumenical Redemption
International and “minister” Edward Jay Robin
Belanger. International Journal of Coercion,
Abuse, and Manipulation, 3. doi:
doi.org/10.54208/1000/0006/004
Netolitzky, D. &Warman, R. (2021). As the Water
Grinds the Stone: Comparison of Represented
and Self-represented Appellant Populations
in the Federal Court of Appeal. Windsor
Yearbook of Access to Justice, 37, 206-259.
Oberkirsch v The Queen, 2016 TCC 84.
https://canlii.ca/t/gphrs
Peck v The Queen, 2018 TCC 52.
https://canlii.ca/t/hr2j8
Perry, B., Hofmann, D., &Scrivens, R. (2017, August).
Working Paper 17-02: Broadening our
Understanding of Anti-Authority Movements
in Canada. TSAS.
https://www.tsas.ca/wp-content/uploads/
2018/03/2017-02_v2PerryFINAL.compressed.
pdf
Pomerleau v Canada (Revenue Agency), 2017 ABQB
123. https://canlii.ca/t/gxnsd
R c Cardin, 2021 QCCS 930. https://canlii.ca/t/jdvvt
R c Paquin, 2021 QCCS 931. https://canlii.ca/t/jdvvs
R v Branch, [2020] OJ No 2628 (QL) (Ont Ct J).
R v Stancer, 2016 BCSC 192.
R v Watts, 2015 ONSC 5597. https://canlii.ca/t/gl0zz