Cultic Studies Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2003, Page 30
English translation:
...local opposition in the village and Info-Cult, an anti-cult organization from
Montreal, declared after September 28 that not only did the healers head ―a
secretive cult where brainwashing was carried out on vulnerable members,‖
but also that ―the unquestioning supporters represent the worst threat to hit
Quebec since the Order of the Solar Temple.‖
As indicated in his footnotes, Introvigne‘s analysis is based on one article, written in English
(Baker, 1995, September 24). However, as a result of obvious errors, he presents a
completely different version of the article, and consequently of Info-Cult‘s role. Aside from
the fact that Introvigne has the date wrong (the actual date of the article was September
24, 1995, not September 30th as he cites), he has made much more serious errors that
distort and misrepresent Info-Cult‘s role. The pertinent sections of the article actually read
as follows:
But skeptics warn that the couple are really running a secretive cult where
they have brainwashed vulnerable members with phony promises of cures,
bilked them of their savings and had them prepare for the end of the world by
stockpiling food and weapons. ―We have a very serious situation here,‖ said
Pierre Rochette, a singer and former Val-David town councillor, who added
that the couple‘s solid core of unquestioning supporters represents the worst
cult threat to hit Quebec since the Order of the Solar Temple. (p. A1)
Baker continues:
Rochette, who estimates the couple‘s clientele at anywhere from 100 to 300
people, has teamed up with Yves Casgrain, a former research director at
Montreal’s Info-Cult [author‘s bold] organization, in a bid to expose the
couple‘s practices. (p. A1)
Casgrain and Rochette‘s position vis-a-vis the ―médecins du ciel‖ was reported in several
newspaper articles (Baker, G., 1995, 29 September Deslauriers, D., 1995, 9 septembre
Lamarche, C., 1995, 7 septembre). Casgrain, however, was speaking as an individual, not
as a representative of Info-Cult, which is the impression that Introvigne gives. This might
seem minor, but would Introvigne want the opinions of his former employees to be
attributed to CESNUR, an organization that he directs?
Hexham’s article on the anti-cult movement in Canada.
Another example involving Info-Cult can be found in Irving Hexham‘s article, ―New Religions
and the Anticult Movement in Canada‖ (2001). Hexham‘s article refers to anticult groups
formed after 1977, saying, ―...today only the Montreal group, which is supported by the
local Jewish community, continues to exist‖ (p. 284-285). As mentioned earlier, Info-Cult
became an independent organization in 1990—11 years before Hexham‘s article—and has
not received funding from the Jewish Community since that time. Moreover, information
about Info-Cult‘s funding sources is available on Info-Cult‘s website:
http://www.math.mcgill.ca/triples/infocult/ic-e2.html or by calling Info-Cult‘s office.
Hexham‘s article further reinforces an inaccurate view of the so-called anti-cult movement,
particularly as it applies to Info-Cult. In the section entitled ―The Canadian Anticult Craze
1979-1982,‖ he writes:
From 1977 onwards various parent‘s groups, often encouraged by university
chaplains, formed across Canada to promote deprogramming and encourage
legislators to pass restrictive laws against religious conversion. (p. 284)

Cultic Studies Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2003, Page 31
Info-Cult was not formed to promote the forcible removal of individuals from any group and
has not encouraged legislators to pass restrictive laws.
Hexham‘s errors would be more excusable were Info-Cult, the leading cult educational
organization in Canada, incidental to the subject of his article. Since, however, his subject
was ―the anti-cult movement in Canada,‖ he should at least have these basic facts straight.
In the article Hexham writes:
…Josh Freed, who subsequently wrote the best selling book, Moonwebs, and
made the film, Ticket to Heaven based on the book. Before the book was
published, Freed wrote several sensational syndicated articles for The
Montreal Star that ―exposed‖ the Unification Church. (p. 283)
… it is tempting to speculate that this intense anticult activity was the result
of a skillful publicity drive by Freed. As a journalist he was in a position to
promote stories that helped both his book and the subsequent film. (p. 285)
The following comments by Freed challenge the ―scholarship‖ of this article:
This series of ―sensational‖ articles won the 1978 National Newspaper Award
for Feature Writing, the most prestigious award given out in Canadian
journalism…The mainstream ―sensational‖ media regularly fact checks, and I
am often called by fact-checkers when my name is mentioned. You would
think an academic journal would do the same. It‘s bad enough the author
didn‘t call at least the journal should have…This was the worst financial
period of my life and it took me a long time to recover, and I didn‘t do it for
the money, but because I cared about it…If it [his book] did well, it was
because it was well written and well researched. (Personal Communication
June 11, 2002)
I find Hexham‘s choice of words, ―it is tempting to speculate,‖ surprising for an article that
is published in a scholarly journal (i.e., Nova Religio). A simple call to the people about
whom he writes might have eliminated his need to ―speculate.‖
Richard Bergeron
The last example is by Richard Bergeron, founder of the Centre d‘Information sur les
Nouvelles Religions (CINR) in Montreal, now known as the Centre Spiritualités et Religions
de Montréal (Montreal Centre on Spirituality and Religions). In his book, Le Cortege des
Fous de Dieu (1982), Bergeron describes deprogramming as ‗‗une méthode psychiquement
violente qui utilise des moyens coercitifs, comme le kidnappage‖ (p. 458). (English
translation: ―a psychically violent method that uses coercive means, like kidnapping.‖) He
also says: ―Il ne devrait pas favoriser l‘utilisation des techniques de ‗deprogramming,‘
comme Info-culte incline à le faire‖ (p. 456). (English translation: ―One should not favor the
use of ‗deprogramming‘ techniques, as Info-cult is inclined to do.‖)
Once again, such statements are not based on a verification of the primary sources, in this
case, Info-Cult.
Fifteen years later Richard Bergeron (1997) pursues his analysis of Info-Cult:
En 1990, Projet-Culte fermait ses portes comme service de B‘nai B‘rith pour
se constituer en organisme autonome sous le nom d‘Info Cult/Info-Secte. Ce
changement de nom n‘implique aucun changement de perspective ni de
méthode d‘intervention. (p. 33) (English translation: In 1990, the Cult Project
closed their doors as a service of B‘nai B‘rith to form an independent
organization called Info Cult /Info-Secte. This change of name didn‘t involve
any change in their perspective nor their method of intervention.)