Cultic Studies Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2003, Page 146
represented. I began to match Steiner‘s adult teachings to the pupils‘ work. When I saw my
child‘s drawing of gnomes mining in a metal mine I recognized Steiner‘s Anthroposophic
context. Steiner taught that gnomes actually exist and can be found in metal mines!
I should like to relate quite simply and plainly how such beings show
themselves to clairvoyant sight. There are beings that can be seen with
clairvoyant vision at many spots in the depths of the earth, especially places
little touched by living growths, places, for instance, in a mine which have
always been of a mineral nature. If you dig into the metallic or stony ground
you find beings which manifest at first in remarkable fashion -it is as if
something were to scatter us. They seem able to crouch close together in vast
numbers, and when the earth is laid open they appear to burst asunder. The
important point is that they do not fly apart into a certain number but that in
their own bodily nature they become larger. Even when they reach their
greatest size, they are still always small creatures in comparison with human
beings. The enlightened man knows nothing of them. People, however, who
have preserved a certain nature-sense, i.e. the old clairvoyant forces which
everyone once possessed and which had to be lost with the acquisition of
objective consciousness, could tell you all sorts of things about such beings.
Many names have been given to them, such as goblins, gnomes and so
forth...Their nature prompts them to play all sorts of tricks on man, as every
miner can tell you who has still preserved something of a healthy nature
sense—not so much the miners in coal mines as those in metal mines.
(Steiner, 1995b, p. 63)
I now comprehend that the Anthroposophical concept of ―art‖ is very different from mine. I
have a completely different understanding of what Waldorfers mean when they say they
develop imagination—they mean they develop psychic sight. And by art, they mean ―The
Art‖ (of magic). Steiner said ―If you bring children as many living pictures as possible, if you
educate them by speaking in pictures, then you sow the seed for a continuous retention of
oxygen for continuous development, because you direct the children toward the future,
toward life after death‖ (Steiner, 1996, p. 62). Even an innocuous picture of a butterfly has
a deeper meaning when you come across Steiner‘s explanation for this lesson, a child‘s first
Anthroposophic introduction to reincarnation:
[T]he presentation of living pictures, or as we might say of symbols, to the
mind, is important for the period between the change of teeth and puberty. It
is important that the secrets of Nature, the laws of life, be taught to the boy
or girl, not in dry intellectual concepts, but as far as possible in symbols.
Parables of the spiritual connexions of things should be brought before the
soul of the child in such a manner that behind the parables he divines and
feels, rather than grasps intellectually, the underlying law in all
existence....An example may serve to make this clear. Let us imagine that we
want to tell a child of the immortality of the soul, of the coming forth of the
soul from the body. The way to do this is to use a comparison, such for
example as the comparison of the butterfly coming forth from the chrysalis.
As the butterfly soars up from the chrysalis, so after death the soul of man
from the house of the body. No man will rightly grasp the fact in intellectual
concepts, who has not first received it in such a picture. A child who has
experienced this, will approach the subject with an altogether different mood
of soul, when later it is taught him in the form of intellectual concepts. It is
indeed a very serious matter for any man, if he was not first enabled to
approach the problems of existence with his feeling. Thus it is essential that
Cultic Studies Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2003, Page 147
the educator have at his disposal parables for all the laws of Nature and
secrets of the world. (Richards, 1980, p. 55)
My examination and documentation of other Waldorf pupil‘s lessons verifies that they too
copied Anthroposophy-for-juniors off the board during class, and not only in picture form.
One child wrote, ―OUT OF HEAVEN INTO BIRTH FROM THE STARS TO THE EARTH I HAVE
FLOWN.‖ Another child transcribed, ―In September Michael is near, he will help us overcome
all fear.‖ Yet the schools frequently deny that they teach Anthroposophy to children.
Recently, a forty-eight page ad for Anthroposophy appeared in Utne Magazine, entitled ―An
Emerging Culture, Rudolf Steiner‘s Continuing Impact in the World.‖ The ad states:
Opponents of Waldorf education, which is based on Steiner‘s insights into
child development, equate the curriculum with anthroposophy, which they
claim to be a religion. Waldorf advocates respond that Rudolf Steiner‘s
anthroposophy is deteminedly [sic] nonreligious and isn‘t taught in Waldorf
schools anyway (Bamford &Utne. 2003, June, p. 11 advertising section
sponsored by Rudolf Steiner Foundation and Utne Magazine).
It frustrates me when people deny that Anthroposophy is a religion and that the schools
don‘t teach Anthroposophy to children because the evidence suggests otherwise. My
daughter‘s books show that indeed she was taught Anthroposophy, in picture form as well
as in written form—‖The human being is like a little universe inside a big one. Sun, moon
and stars find their likeness in mans head, trunk and limbs‖—‖The Sylphs, Salamanders,
Gnomes and Undines are the earth‘s scribes‖—‖The body is the house of the spirit,‖ etc. If
you deconstruct the lessons, the curriculum and the pedagogy, you cannot ignore the fact
that Waldorf is a mystery school, a magical lodge for juniors.
―Verse‖
When Steiner developed Waldorf, he deliberately veiled Anthroposophy by ―organically‖
incorporating it into the classroom. Anthroposophy is inextricably intertwined with Waldorf‘s
daily classroom activity and lessons. In 1920 he asked the first Waldorf teachers not to call
a prayer a prayer but, rather, a verse:
We will also talk about a prayer. But there is just one thing I should like to
ask you. You know, with these things the outer form is of the utmost
importance. Never call the verse a ‗prayer‘ but a ‗school opening verse‘. Do
see to it that people do not hear the expression ‗prayer‘ used by a teacher.
This will go a long way towards overcoming the prejudice that this is an
anthroposophical school. (Steiner, 1986, p. 45)
Eugene Schwartz has also clarified that the verse is a prayer:
I have a 9-year-old daughter she‘s in third grade at Green Meadow Waldorf
school. And these are some of my experiences. I know every morning she
says a verse, and, as Dan [Dugan] pointed out, it‘s a verse that speaks to
God. I would call it a prayer: that‘s what I used to tell my class. You‘re
speaking a prayer. I want you to stand still, I don‘t want you to move around,
I want you to really be respectful because we‘re talking to God now. And a
child said, ―You mean we‘re praying?‖, and I said yes, we‘re praying.
(Schwartz, 1999, November 13, paragraph 17).
Teachers not as open as Eugene Schwartz are imposing worship of Steiner‘s Sun Being on
children without parental sanction. As my daughter‘s parent, I was unaware of this prayer
during our Waldorf haze. I did not know that this prayer was being prayed each morning by
my daughter at her ―nonsectarian‖ school. I learned about it after leaving, when in my
research I came upon this:
Previous Page Next Page