Cultic Studies Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2003, Page 224
there have been religions.‖ In America the pendulum swung from right in Puritan theocracy
to left in constitutionally protected religious freedom. It swings right when civil issues are
seen as moral imperatives requiring political action. There are many varieties of Christian
fundamentalists, but all are committed to absolute literal scriptural truth, which only they
possess and which empowers them to evangelize. ―Modernism‖ is the label for deviating
from their version and interpretation of the Bible. They become part of problems they try to
solve obsessively, incompletely, unlawfully or with ―fixed certainty they are right about what
God wants and God wants them to be in power‖ (p. 26). This has led to social isolation
oblivious to those outside the exclusive group of the born again or saved, a simplistic
worldview.
Chapter 3 cites the case of a supposedly religious father who beat his daughter, who later
died of the injury. A study is reported that found religious affiliation ―a better predictor of
violent behavior toward children than age, gender, social class, or size of residence‖ (p. 49).
Corporal punishment in schools is cited as legal in some states though proven ineffective.
There are contradictions. Sex abuse is said to be more likely in patriarchal family structures,
when sex is considered sinful but happens and is denied and kept secret. Most Catholics are
not necessarily fundamentalists but their church is, ―the authoritarian, closed, absolutist
hierarchy that allowed and to a degree promoted the disgrace the church faces today‖ (p.
55). A study reported increased victimization by non-relatives as a family‘s religious activity
decreases, yet Koresh‘s Branch Davidians is given as an example of molestation ―perceived
as a commandment from God‖ (p. 57). Religion in the schools is discussed from the old
McGuffy‘s Readers to private religious schools, Jewish after-school programs, and home
schooling to offset Protestant influence or provide what is seen as better quality instruction.
The realities of maintaining standards and the effect of social isolation are examined. The
chapter ends defending freedom of religion but not as a ―disguise‖ for physical, sexual, or
intellectual abuse.
Chapter 4 describes fundamentalist male dominance, despite the emergence of female
equality in government and the workplace. Adhering to literal Biblical translation justifies
discrimination since both the Old and New Testaments place women in a subservient role.
The Christian right goes further by attacking female equality and ―glorifying
submissiveness.‖ Pat Robertson is quoted calling feminism ―a socialist, anti-family political
movement encouraging women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice
witchcraft, destroy capitalism, and become lesbians‖ (p. 82). If God is male, submitting to
men becomes a sacred duty. Studies cited show women in subordinate marital roles have
lower self-esteem and are subjected to more physical and mental abuse. Opposition to ERA
and abortion rights is detailed. The chapter ends concluding ―women raised in Christian
fundamentalist homes suffer emotionally, sexually, and physically as adults‖ (p. 113)
Chapter 5 describes the effect of Christian fundamentalism on society. Belief about
procreation ―leads to poverty‖ by ―untimely or unwanted pregnancies,‖ though other causes
of poverty are acknowledged (p. 116). Many Crisis Pregnancy Clinics use ―shock tactics‖
and false information ―even when a single mother already has several children and no
income‖ (p. 118). Though ―vehemently denied‖ fundamentalism contributes to prejudice,
discrimination, and hate crimes. There has been bigotry between Catholics and Protestants
and Christians and Jews, Muslims, and atheists. Historically, slavery was ―favored by
conservative Christians‖ and ―extreme Christian based sects‖ such as the Ku Klux Klan and
Aryan Nation (p. 119). Bob Jones University is an example of the most segregated private
religious schools. Judging homosexuality a sin justifies discrimination by sexual preference.
Exhibitionism ―appears to be related to fundamentalism‖ (p. 138) and 12 of 18 mass or
serial killers had ―very religious upbringing or belief in demons and devils‖ (p. 139). Moral
and social development theories of Kohlberg, Durkheim, and Riesman are cited showing
fundamentalists are stuck at an externalized law and order stage. Though ―only a small
Cultic Studies Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2003, Page 225
fraction‖ become terrorists ―the number holding such attitudes is undoubtedly significant‖
(p. 141). All these factors cause a ―fundamentalist ripple‖ through society with ―negative
consequences‖ (p. 153).
Chapter 6 examines Christian fundamentalism in the context of the First Amendment. It
alleges ―most wars, conquests, and bloodsheds (sic) throughout history have featured a
strong religious element‖ (p. 155). The First Amendment has kept us from ―the bottomless
pit of religious war.‖ A ―key argument‖ of Christian fundamentalists is that a Christian nation
has ―lost touch with its Christian origins‖ (p. 159). This is a myth allowing religion ―into all
aspects of public and governmental endeavors.‖ The First Amendment ensures freedom of
and also from religion, thus encompassing all citizens. Supreme Court decisions relating to
it are explored, such as school busing, religious clubs or classes in public schools, school
prayer, public funds for parochial teacher salaries, school vouchers, creationism as science
―almost exclusively an American phenomenon‖ (p. 162), and the latest, the faith-based
initiative (p. 162). Challenges to the First Amendment have ―skyrocketed over the past
decade‖ (p. 164). The strategy of the religious right is to ―flaunt symbolic challenges‖ as a
―distraction from substantive matters.‖ Both should be opposed ―but the resources are not
there‖ (p. 165).
Chapter 7 describes political tactics of the Christian right, mainly political activism such as
endorsing conservative candidates, supporting restrictive legislation, media saturation and
manipulation, and strategic alliances. ―Politics is the art of negotiation and compromise
while fundamentalism espouses an uncompromising and absolutist worldview‖ (p. 192).
―They would like to replace our secular democracy with a fundamentalist theocracy‖ (p.
204). Dissenters are considered ―not true Christians‖ or as attacking religion. The author‘s
gubernatorial candidacy confronting fundamentalist politics is detailed as a kind of case
study. The ―religious right is currently much better organized than the political left‖ (p.
206). It is a minority ―though an energized and outspoken one‖ (p. 208), and the author
recommends more cooperation in challenging extremist claims.
Chapter 8 repeats the warning: ―fundamentalism presents real dangers to the lives and
liberties of all Americans‖ (p. 209). Repeated also is the disclaimer that not all
fundamentalists are dangerous but those who are behave more emotionally than rationally
they are unyielding, militaristic and militant absolutists, who demand strict obedience and
unquestioning loyalty They are ―willing to be violent in the course of doing ‗battle royal‘‖ (p.
210). Islamic extremism is described as similar but not identical, despite ―brusque dismissal
by Christian fundamentalists‖ (p. 212). Similarities are their treatment of women,
opposition to abortion and homosexuality, censorship, and intolerance of dissent. ―Paranoid
and extremist thoughts of vengeance are common among fundamentalists‖ (p.227). We
should empathize with their ―needs, fears, and anxieties‖ (p. 227). Secularists ―looking
beyond their own beliefs or lack of beliefs are the only hope for combating the perils of
fundamentalism‖ (p. 211). ―Secularism is quintessentially the American way‖ (p. 222). It
accepts differences, cultural diversity, social complexity, alternative explanations, a
scientific approach ―where all religions and philosophies compete in the marketplace of
ideas‖ (p. 240).
This book is an encyclopedic indictment of the extreme Christian right, but its content can
be applied to any extremist belief system. It and the current world situation can help
awaken us to the need to consider and better understand all sides of religious differences
and see them in total and true perspective. The book is recommended for what it is: a well-
articulated informative secular presentation in the debate between liberal and conservative
views of religion and the danger in extremes.
Frank MacHovec, Ph.D.
Center for the Study of Self
Previous Page Next Page