Cultic Studies Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2006, Page 83
Zablocki, Benjamin. (2001). Towards a demystified and disinterested scientific theory of brainwashing.
In B. Zablocki &T. Robbins (Eds.), Misunderstanding cults: Searching for objectivity in a
controversial field. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Michael D. Langone, Ph.D., a counseling psychologist, is ICSA‘s Executive Director. He
was the founder editor of Cultic Studies Journal (CSJ), the editor of CSJ‘s successor, Cultic
Studies Review, and editor of Recovery from Cults. He is co-author of Cults: What Parents
Should Know and Satanism and Occult-Related Violence: What You Should Know. Dr.
Langone has spoken and written widely about cults. In 1995, he received the Leo J. Ryan
Award from the "original" Cult Awareness network and was honored as the Albert V.
Danielsen visiting Scholar at Boston University. (mail@icsamail.com )
This article is an electronic version of an article originally published in Cultic Studies Review, 2006, Volume 5, Number 2,
pages 268-306. Please keep in mind that the pagination of this electronic reprint differs from that of the bound volume.
This fact could affect how you enter bibliographic information in papers that you may write.
Zablocki, Benjamin. (2001). Towards a demystified and disinterested scientific theory of brainwashing.
In B. Zablocki &T. Robbins (Eds.), Misunderstanding cults: Searching for objectivity in a
controversial field. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Michael D. Langone, Ph.D., a counseling psychologist, is ICSA‘s Executive Director. He
was the founder editor of Cultic Studies Journal (CSJ), the editor of CSJ‘s successor, Cultic
Studies Review, and editor of Recovery from Cults. He is co-author of Cults: What Parents
Should Know and Satanism and Occult-Related Violence: What You Should Know. Dr.
Langone has spoken and written widely about cults. In 1995, he received the Leo J. Ryan
Award from the "original" Cult Awareness network and was honored as the Albert V.
Danielsen visiting Scholar at Boston University. (mail@icsamail.com )
This article is an electronic version of an article originally published in Cultic Studies Review, 2006, Volume 5, Number 2,
pages 268-306. Please keep in mind that the pagination of this electronic reprint differs from that of the bound volume.
This fact could affect how you enter bibliographic information in papers that you may write.
