Cultic Studies Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2006, Page 37
until he finally, in 1857, lost his life in a failed revolt. To him is ascribed the apparition of
the notion of ―Propaganda of Action.‖[11] The Italian extremist clearly articulated that the
people have to be shaken up, and simultaneously fear among the enemies to the revolution
has to be spread.
Such ideas were particularly attractive to the revolutionary forces in Tsarist Russia. In the
spirit of Pisacane, Michael Bakunin became another influential theoretician of terrorism in
the nineteenth century. He was active not only in Russia, but also in Germany during the
revolution of 1848-49 in France and in Switzerland. In his Principles of Revolution,
published in 1869, Bakunin made it clear that he and his friends would never accept any
other method than destruction. The final goal is revolution because evil can only be
terminated through violence and Russian soil will only be cleansed by fire and sword.
Furthermore, Bakunin wrote and published a Revolutionary Catechism in which he gave
rules of conduct for terrorists. He coined the term, ―anonymous terrorist,‖ referring to one
who was supposed to radically break with society and deny all its laws, customs, and
conventions. He advised the terrorists of his time to dispose of the most dangerous enemies
(all those who were conspicuous because of their intelligence or particular talents) at the
beginning. This was to terrify both the government and the people alike. Literally futuristic
was his advice to cooperate closely with criminals and criminal organizations.[12]
Revolutionary Terrorism in Tsarist Russia
Prior to World War I, it was the Russian terrorists who dominated the scene and were also
the most successful. The first organization to put the theories of Pisacane and Bakunin into
practice was the Russian ―Naradnaja Wolja‖ (People‘s Will, sometimes also translated as
People‘s Freedom) founded in 1878. This consisted of a small group of Russian
constitutionalists who stood in direct opposition to the Tsar‘s reign. In the face of the
―Apathy and Estrangement of the Russian masses‖ the members of the group attempted—
by way of absolutely courageous deeds—to draw the public‘s attention to the goals and
ideals of the organization. However, in stark contrast to the terror organizations of the late
twentieth and the beginning of the twenty-first century that distinguish themselves by
bloodshed and carnage on a large, indiscriminate scale, the Naradnaja Wolja took a
particularly discriminating stance on the violence it applied. The Russian terrorists of those
days transformed the ―propaganda of violence‖ into assaults that were exclusively directed
against individuals who were deemed to be ―embodiments of the autocratic regime of
repression.‖[13]
Nationalist Terrorism on the Balkans and in Ireland
Terrorism was also believed by its early proponents to be able to determine the course of
history. After the Austrians had taken power in the region, a group of Bosnian-Serb
intellectuals, including university students and even high school pupils (later becoming
known as the Mlada Bosnia or Young Bosnians), formed against the Hapsburg reign. One of
their members, Gavrilo Princip, eventually triggered, through his assassination of the
successor to the Austrian throne, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, on June 28, 1914, the chain of
events that led to the outbreak of the First World War and the ensuing totally new political
order in Europe. Behind the Young Bosnians stood the secret society ―Narodna Odbrana‖
(Defense of the People), which was originally founded in 1908, to foster the Serbian cultural
and national activities. However, it soon assumed a more pronounced political and
subversive orientation and gained notoriety for terrorist activities against the Hapsburg
Austro-Hungarian Monarchy. The Narodna Odbrana was able to recruit new members,
especially among the young Bosnians and Herzegovinans, and it was not long until the
terrorism of this group achieved ever higher levels of brutality. In 1911, the even more
radical group ―Crna Ruka‖ (Black Hand) split off from the Narodna Odbrana. Although there
were originally close ties among the Serb military leadership, the Crna Ruka and the Young
Cultic Studies Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2006, Page 38
Bosnians, the relationship between these elements was not one of direct control or total
manipulation. Rather, we have to assume a situation of mutual influence and interrelation.
However, there is some indication that the Black Hand attempted to force Austria into
measures against Serbia in order to drive both countries into war by assassinating the
Archduke and successor to the Austrian throne.[14] But, irrespective of the correctness of
this assumption, the events that led to the outbreak of World War I demonstrate how
immense the impact of this ―privatized‖ nationalist violence of terrorism can be at the
highest level of global politics.
After World War I, the Irish Republican Army (IRA) was founded in 1919 as a Catholic
underground organization, which was at the same time to represent the ―armed arm‖ of the
nationalist Irish Party Sinn Fein. Although a part of the IRA dissolved itself into the newly
founded state of Ireland in 1921, the militant wing fought on until 1923 in order to achieve
a total disconnection from Great Britain and the annexation of Northern Ireland. In the late
1920s, the IRA existed as a small armed group—forbidden in England as well as in Ireland—
before sinking into oblivion for many years, until the second half of the twentieth century,
when it gained new significance again. Ever since 1967, it has been involved in violent
clashes close to civil war. The forceful confrontation with London eventually resulted in a
split within the IRA. While the Marxist ―Officials‖ were striving for a political solution to the
Northern Ireland question, the Nationalist ―Provisionals‖ continued to resort to terrorism.
Subsequent to the declaration of a cease fire in 1993 among Sinn Féin, the moderate
Northern Ireland Catholics, and Great Britain, as well as subsequent to the launch of
another peace process, the IRA joined in a cease fire agreement in August of 1994.
Nevertheless, the year 1996 brought back new terrorist attacks and, in spite of another
peace agreement between London and Sinn Féin in 1998, terrorism by IRA extremists
remains an imminent threat.
“Werwolf”
Both terrorism and guerilla warfare joined hands during World War II. But it was not only to
fight the troops of the German Wehrmacht it was also the National Socialist leadership—
particularly in the phase of the collapse of the Reich—that considered terrorist actions to be
an appropriate means of fighting the war. Consequently, toward the end of the war, under
the codename Werwolf, it commenced underground activities against the allied forces that
can by all means, from today‘s view, be called terrorism. The codename itself might have
been taken from the novel by Hermann Löns titled Der Werwolf, published in 1910, which
portrayed the ―guerilla‖ war farmers and peasants from lower Saxony fought against regular
armies during the Thirty-Years War.
Terrorism for National Independence after 1945
In the late 1940s and 1950s, terrorism re-emerged in connection with violent insurgencies
against European Colonial powers. In fact, such different states as for example Algeria,
Israel or Kenya owe their independency, to a not insignificant degree, to nationalist political
movements using terrorism as a weapon against the colonial powers. Not to anyone‘s
surprise against this backdrop of violent de-colonization, the term terrorist was thrust aside
by the ―politically correct‖ term of ―freedom fighter.‖ The new terminology somehow
mirrored the recognition most of the liberation movements received by a large part of the
international community.[15] In the course of this development we find the founding in
1964 of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) under Egyptian influence as a loose
cover for several Palestine resistance groups. The goal was to establish an independent Arab
state on the soil of the former British Mandate of Palestine, while terminating the state of
Israel. It was the PLO president, Yassir Arafat, who expressed in a speech before the UN
Assembly in 1974, what distinguished, in his opinion, a freedom fighter from a revolutionary
or terrorist: ―The difference between a revolutionary and a terrorist … lies in the reason for
Previous Page Next Page