Cultic Studies Review, Vol. 3, Nos. 2 &3, 2004, Page 142
do believe that there are valid comparisons to be made between the two. They note that
during the 1970s the seminar ministry was filling not only churches but also stadiums. Like
Kane, the people in general loved Bill Gothard. But back at the institute anyone who
challenged Gothard‘s rule was marked for mistreatment. One female staff person fell victim
to Gothard‘s authoritarian ways when she was fired in 1971 because she did not obey his
order to forego dating.
―The Emerald City‖ is the title of the third chapter. There the authors compare Christians
who found themselves in the strange and scary world of the Vietnam protests, sexual
revolution, and youth rebellion to Dorothy who had found herself in the frightening Land of
Oz. Just as Dorothy was looking to the wizard for answers, Christians looked to Bill Gothard
as the authority with all the answers that could get them safely home and out of the chaos
that had surrounded them during those turbulent years. The authors also draw upon
contemporary literature for chapter titles. They begin chapter seven (―The Orwellian World
of Bill Gothard‖) with a quotation from Animal Farm by George Orwell in which one of the
animals warns the others if they were allowed to make their own decisions, they might in
fact make the wrong decisions! Overall the presentation is clear and the organization of the
book is appropriate.
One of the strengths of the book is the relating of the stories of followers who followed the
directions of the leaders of IBLP. One moving story is that of Pastor Johnny Jones in
chapter seven who moved his family from California to Michigan to be part of an African
American presence in IBLP. But he discovered instead broken promises, power struggles
and backstabbing. A typical power struggle was when Emmett Mitchell was brought in as
the General Director of the Character Inn in Flint, Michigan where Pastor Jones was working
for IBLP. In a short while it became clear that Mitchell was a mere figurehead director who
had been brought in because of his connections in the banking industry. The real authority
was a staff member named Pat LaMantia, who was in charge of the front desk office. At one
point Johnny and his wife Shantelle felt that they were under surveillance, that their mail
was being opened, and that someone was sifting through possessions that they had put into
storage. After a time of feeling increasingly harassed by Ms. LaMantia, Johnny learned that
she was actually running the Character Inn and loyally following the directives of Gothard.
Pastor Jones and his family left after discovering that a sixteen-year-old girl was sent to
prepare and bring a meal to Bill Gothard. This girl told Pastor Jones that Bill Gothard was
her best friend and that Bill Gothard called her all the time to come to see him. Scandalized
by this activity, Pastor Jones turned in his resignation, and his family departed from the
Character Inn. The Joneses had been promised an offering in July 2000 to help them in
their move from California to Michigan. The balance of this money was never paid to him.
As he reflected on his experience of his involvement with IBLP, Pastor Jones felt that the
real lesson that he learned was that Bill Gothard did not live up to the principles that he
taught in his seminars and materials. He has a growing concern for others who like him and
his family have been devastated by Gothard and IBLP.
The book is less useful in those sections in which they authors theologize. Those parts of
the book have less interest and appeal outside of the conservative Protestant world in which
the authors operate. A typical example of this occurs in chapter five when the authors
discuss for over ten pages how Gothard‘s theology of grace turns away from the
Reformation toward what they term the Roman Catholic doctrine of salvation based on
works. So too the last ten pages of the epilogue contain a somewhat tedious discussion
about sanctification by works, the righteousness of the Law, and grace as the unmerited
favor of God.
Bill Gothard has had success in reaching the core leadership of American Christian
conservative churches. This book effectively and thoroughly sounds the alarm on how this
ministry has exerted abusive spiritual authority on many of its participants. Dr. Robert
Cultic Studies Review, Vol. 3, Nos. 2 &3, 2004, Page 143
Stewart, Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Theology at New Orleans Baptist Theological
Seminary in New Orleans sums up the matter fairly well when he writes that this book
should be read by virtually all evangelical pastors and anyone who has attended a Gothard
seminar, is considering attending one, or just wants to know more about the ministry of Bill
Gothard.
Rev. Dr. John Dillon
Charles Mason Remey and the Bahá'í Faith
Francis C. Spataro
Tover Publications, The Remey Society. 80-46 234 St., Queens, NY 11427-2116.
2003 40 pages (paperback). $15. ISBN 0-9671656-3-6.
Mr. Spataro‘s account of Remey‘s life borders on adoration. Spataro‘s intensity is, of course,
not shared by the current leadership of the Faith.
The back cover tells the reader that Spataro, a high school teacher, was first introduced to
the Faith by followers of Remey in 1976. For three years he researched the life of Remey
and others who follow what they call the ―Orthodox Bahá'í Faith.‖ He gives an economical
but clear history of the Faith up to the time of his writing, 1987.
For Spataro, the ―apostolic period‖ of the Faith began in 1863 when Mirza Husayn Ali, (1817
– 1892) exiled son of the Persian prime minister, was living in Baghdad. Spataro said he
was recognized by ―Moslems, Jews, Zoroastrians, Hindus, Buddhists and Christians‖ as
Jesus Christ returned to earth. His disciples called him Bahá'u'lláh, the glory of God on
Earth. For Spataro, the apostolic period ended when Shoghi Effendi Rabbani, Bahá'u'lláh's
great-grandson died in 1957 without a will specifying who should be the next guardian of
the Faith.
Spataro compares what happened next to the violation of God‘s covenant that occurred in
early Islam when certain Muslim elders set aside the wishes of Mohammed that his son-in-
law Ali be his successor. In 1963, the institution of guardianship, set up by Bahá'u'lláh's son
was set aside by the ―Hands of the Cause‖ and, according to Spataro, an ―unduly elected‖
―International House of Justice‖ abrogated the guardianship completely.
Remey, appointed by Shoghi Effendi himself in 1951 as the President of the International
Bahá'í Council, led a minority of the membership against the ―Hands of the Cause,‖ who
decided they should simply carry on the Faith without a guardian, utilizing the
democratically elected local, national and international ―Houses of Justice‖ as the final word
on matters not specified in the writings of Bahá'u'lláh. Spataro condemns all this implying a
will was unnecessary and that Remey was the legitimate and duly designated Sacred Head
or Second Guardian.
Forced into ―exile‖ in the Florentine suburb of Fiesole, Remey lived out his life branded as a
defector, who, after losing lawsuits, was publicly unable to use the term ―Bahá'í. Those who
followed him called the new group, ―The Abha World Faith: the Orthodox World Faith of
Bahá'u'lláh.‖ His followers consider The Bahá'ís of Haifa ―usurpers.‖
Spataro is not content to leave the story there. He adds a final chapter as a sort of olive
branch that asserts all ―Bahá'ís‖ agree that Bahá'u'lláh is the ―Lord of the New Day,‖
regardless of their view of the present administration.
Precious few details of Remey‘s early life are given. The book feels like it is a mercilessly
cut-down version of a longer work, skipping sometimes in mid sentence from one thought to
another. The story of Remey‘s conversion in 1899 at age 25 out of the anti-hierarchy Anglo-
Catholic Oxford Movement is astonishingly short of detail. Spataro instead focuses on the
―firmness and devotion to the cause‖ of those who were Remey‘s early instructors.
Previous Page Next Page