International Journal of Cultic Studies Vol. 10, 2019 45
was 9 months old. At that time, Sarah and her
husband left the child with Sarah’s mother “for a
couple of hours ...so we could have a date
night.” Sarah said that when she went to pick up
her daughter from her mother’s house, she
walked in on her mother molesting her daughter.
She described feeling a rush of physical and
emotional numbness and derealization as she
grabbed her daughter and quickly left the house.
Sarah said that she reported the abuse to child
protective services and began meeting with a
counselor. Sarah and her husband then relocated
to another state and ceased all contact with
Sarah’s mother.
Since this experience 4 years ago, Sarah has
relocated multiple times and discontinued all
contact with her mother, father, brother, and all
other family members. She described herself and
her present family as “on the run” from cult
members and from her mother, who “want me
dead because I talked.” Sarah said that she had
been in counseling on and off since her mother
molested her daughter, and that new memories
seemed to be consistently surfacing. Sarah and
her husband had another child when their first
daughter was 2 years old.
After her family relocated so that Sarah could
attend the state university, she was referred to a
resource center on campus for counseling
services. Sarah began meeting with me over the
summer as she was settling her family into
campus housing and preparing for the fall
semester. She asked that counseling be used as
her “trauma therapy space,” because she felt that
“no one else will believe me ...just you and my
husband.”
Assessment
My initial assessment of Sarah consisted of a
biopsychosocial intake assessment. The
assessment included questions inquiring about
Sarah’s presenting problem and her history of
suicidal ideation, homicidal ideation, self-
injurious behavior, substance use and abuse,
prescription medication, previous diagnoses,
medical history, family of origin and their
medical and trauma histories, and her traumatic
experiences. Sarah indicated that her primary
presenting problem was panic attacks and
insomnia, which she attributed to extensive
childhood trauma. Sarah’s trauma history thus
became a point of consistent reassessment and
exploration in session.
Case Conceptualization: Course of
Treatment and Assessment of Progress
Sarah’s treatment in counseling initially focused
on achieving psychological stability and
improved access to resources. This included
Sarah accessing resources through the university
where she was a student, and also applying for
healthcare benefits and nutritional assistance.
Additionally, Sarah and I cultivated
psychological resources such as coping
strategies and improved distress tolerance. The
final portion of treatment focused on Sarah
processing traumatic memories and grieving the
loss of “alters” or fragmented portions of her
identity.
Phase 1: Pragmatic Interventions
During her intake assessment, Sarah reported a
previous diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder
(ASD) in childhood. She attributed a range of
current experiences to ASD, including her
struggle to read other’s social cues and her need
for a consistent schedule, and overwhelming
anxiety when she was faced with changes. She
described experiencing a sense of overwhelm
and panic when confronted with too many
auditory stimuli, and so she used headphones
and loud music “to cope.”
Sarah stated that she believed that the ASD
symptoms she had experienced since childhood
complicated the distressing symptoms she
experienced following episodes of ritual abuse.
Examples of the complicated interplay of
symptoms include Sarah’s tendency to
experience panic attacks on campus when any of
the following occurred: an unexpected change in
class schedule, group activities that required
conversing with classmates, and interacting with
anyone during days associated with the
anniversary of a trauma. Sarah and I worked
together to identify practical ways of insuring
her success as a student, while we also
developed ways for her to regulate
overwhelming affect and surf the somatic
sensations associated with anxiety attacks.
46 International Journal of Cultic Studies Vol. 10, 2019
During the first phase of treatment, Sarah’s
stability and access to resources was the priority.
Initially, attending to her basic needs was not
only the most pragmatic approach, but also one
that aligned with Herman’s (2015/1992)
triphasic model of trauma recovery. Following
the intake assessment, our first goal was to
obtain academic accommodations through the
university. Sarah met with a rehabilitation-
counseling case worker who assessed her
symptoms and provided her with a letter for her
course instructors that indicated Sarah was to
receive excused absences and extended time to
complete assignments and tests.
Once Sarah had obtained academic
accommodations, she met with a student
advocate who helped her to understand the
financial costs that were applied to her
university bursar’s account and the status of her
financial aid. The advocate set up a meeting
between Sarah and a financial-aid advisor, who
then helped her to obtain multiple scholarships
and a loan to cover the costs of attending
classes. After multiple meetings with advocates
and advisors, Sarah obtained enough financial
aid to be able to register for courses.
Sarah stated that both she and her husband were
struggling to find work. Sarah met with an
advocate through campus career services who
helped her to create a resume and apply for
multiple student jobs and work-study positions
on campus. Sarah also utilized this resource to
role play and further develop her interview
skills. To ensure that Sarah and her family’s
basic needs were met, I assisted Sarah in
completing the applications for Medicaid, the
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
(SNAP), and Women, Infants, and Children
(WIC) benefits.
Phase 1: Psychological Resources
After the first four sessions, Sarah stated that she
felt she had the resources she needed to be
successful as a student, and that she wished to
begin addressing the panic attacks, nightmares,
and distress she experienced as a result of her
traumatic memories. At that point, her primary
focus in treatment shifted from building access
to resources needed for daily living to
developing both tolerance to distress and coping
skills.
I obtained Sarah’s permission to introduce her to
some of the models for understanding
posttrauma reactions. Sarah and I reviewed
Porges’s (2004) polyvagal theory, exploring
how Sarah was presently experiencing fight,
flight, and immobilization in response to trauma
reminders. Sarah and I discussed how her body
seemed to unconsciously detect whether an
individual or situation was safe or unsafe, with
the body perceiving the majority of stimuli as
threatening. We explored early signs that her
autonomic nervous system was beginning to
react, and also identified the related trauma
triggers (Levine, 1997). Identifying triggers
enabled me to begin inducing these reactions in
session, and for Sara to practice coping
strategies (e.g., mindful breathing coupled with
grounding exercises, leaning in to the somatic
and emotional experience).
Phase 2: Trauma Processing
Each of Sarah’s counseling sessions included a
review of the status of resources and current
needs before we engaged in any traumatic
material. Phase 2 consisted of processing
traumatic material while creating a “trauma
narrative” (Herman, 2015/1992) that brought
together multiple fragments to create a cohesive
chronology of events. During each session, I
asked Sarah whether she had had a distressing
memory surface over the previous week. She
usually reported three to five fragmented
memories that had caused particular distress,
either through adrenaline-inducing nightmares
or from newly identified trauma reminders.
Van der Kolk’s (1996) model of the
fragmentation of trauma memory provided Sarah
and me with a means for understanding how her
memories were stored and recalled. Each time
Sarah reexperienced a traumatic memory, she
would recall only a couple of pieces perceived
through touch, taste, smell, feel, or hearing. Van
der Kolk (1996) explained this phenomenon to
be the result of the fragmented nature of trauma
memories. During a traumatic experience, the
individual’s threshold for affect and distress are
surpassed, and the mind fragments the memories
and fails to process them into declarative
Previous Page Next Page