Cultic Studies Journal, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1986 Page 83
Lewis‘s letter contends that his performance at the Nebraska conference contained no comparison
between the views of those in cults and those who have left. These quotations from the
videotape may help his memory.
It should be noted that James Lewis and this correspondent had several pleasant conversations
during the Nebraska conference. We have also had a friendly written correspondence. Cordiality,
however, should not be an excuse for a lapse in accuracy. He did make the statements quoted
above.
Kevin Garvey
Consultant on Psychological Training Systems
Carlisle, Pennsylvania
Correction
―Sects or New Religious Movements: A Pastoral Challenge‖ (reprinted in the CSJ 3, 93-116) was
originally released by the Vatican on May 3, 1986 and not on June 11, 1986 as stated in the
note to the CSJ reprint of the document.
This article is an electronic version of an article originally published in Cultic Studies Journal, 1986, Volume 3,
Number 2, pages 68, 269. Please keep in mind that the pagination of this electronic reprint differs from that of the
bound volume. This fact could affect how you enter bibliographic information in papers that you may write.
Lewis‘s letter contends that his performance at the Nebraska conference contained no comparison
between the views of those in cults and those who have left. These quotations from the
videotape may help his memory.
It should be noted that James Lewis and this correspondent had several pleasant conversations
during the Nebraska conference. We have also had a friendly written correspondence. Cordiality,
however, should not be an excuse for a lapse in accuracy. He did make the statements quoted
above.
Kevin Garvey
Consultant on Psychological Training Systems
Carlisle, Pennsylvania
Correction
―Sects or New Religious Movements: A Pastoral Challenge‖ (reprinted in the CSJ 3, 93-116) was
originally released by the Vatican on May 3, 1986 and not on June 11, 1986 as stated in the
note to the CSJ reprint of the document.
This article is an electronic version of an article originally published in Cultic Studies Journal, 1986, Volume 3,
Number 2, pages 68, 269. Please keep in mind that the pagination of this electronic reprint differs from that of the
bound volume. This fact could affect how you enter bibliographic information in papers that you may write.
