41
Lynn Brunet |Ripping back the veil on Masonic abuse
turned upside down, and the everyday laws of morality
are derided. Turner (1982) describes the initiates in
these rites as being taught ‘that they did not know what
they thought they knew. Beneath the surface structure
of custom was a deep structure, whose rules they had to
learn, through paradox and shock’ (p. 42). Non-Western
secret societies have traditionally been associated with
these practices and incorporate death-and-rebirth
symbolism into their initiations (Eliade, 1995). In his
study of Mozart’s involvement in Freemasonry, Paul
Nettl (1987) suggests that these primordial practices
may have been the original basis for modern Western
secret societies, which in turn led to the elaborate and
formalised rituals of the institution of Freemasonry in
the eighteenth century (p. 93).
Four out of the five case studies here have known
or likely family connections to the Masonic Order
(Cronin, 1997, p. 9 Fitzpatrick, 2005 J. Golding,
2012, p. 53 Jung, 1963, p. 220). Freemasonry, as the
Encyclopædia Britannica (2026) describes it, is:
the teachings and practices of the fraternal (men
only) order of Free and Accepted Masons, the
largest worldwide secret society...spread by the
advance of the British Empire and remaining
most popular in the British Isles and other
countries originally within the empire.
However, the extent to which Freemasonry can be
described as secret is debatable, given the three centuries’
worth of literature, exploring its beliefs, practices and
symbolism, even including reproductions of some of
the rituals, so that research into it is far easier than
into many other groups. The first three degrees with
which the Masonic journey begins, known as Craft
or Blue Masonry, are the Entered Apprentice, Fellow
Craft and Master Mason degrees (Duncan, 1866).
Every Mason who wants to progress further into one
of the other Masonic Rites (sometimes called higher
degrees) must first undergo these three Craft degrees.
All degrees involve rituals, many of them loosely
based on biblical themes, allegorical tales, and moral
lessons, and often include oaths of secrecy, while the
initiates are sometimes blindfolded. Solomon’s temple
is a central theme and symbolises the individual’s
spiritual life. In the second or Fellow Craft degree, the
building of this temple symbolises the initiate’s own
inner process of gradual spiritual development. The
rituals involve a physical enactment of the narratives
within the lodge room and express a search for ‘light’,
understood as philosophical, spiritual, or mystical
illumination (Duncan, 1866). The organisation aims to
chart a course of spiritual and moral development for
the betterment of its members.
However, the Masonic Order has long been aware
of the potential misuse of its rituals and calls these
corrupt versions ‘spurious Freemasonry’, ‘irregular
practice’, ‘Hedge Masons’ and ‘side degrees’ (Lawrence,
1924, p. 190 Roberts, 1974, p. 28 Universal Co-
Masonry, 2026).1 These practices are not sanctioned by
the various Grand Lodges, but they can nevertheless
appear within some fraternal contexts as distorted
versions of the approved rituals. The potential for abuse
of the initiates is one of the attributes of older versions
of the degrees. Reports of abuse in Masonic contexts
or misuse of Masonic rituals or regalia have appeared
regularly in the literature of ritual abuse (Brunet, 2007
Katchen, 1992, p. 10 Kent, 1993, 1998 Schröder et al,
2020 Scott, 2001, p. 127). The sociologist Stephen Kent
(1993, 1998) used the term deviant Freemasonry in the
context of allegations of ritual abuse in North America
by individuals whose fathers were Freemasons. But as
far as this author is aware, the Order has not publicly
admitted to the use of Masonic rites for child abuse.
This author has suggested that since the eighteenth
century, the Masonic Order may have been ritually
enacting trauma on the body and psyche, centuries
before it was discussed in modern psychology and
psychiatry (Brunet, 2007). Some Masonic authors,
such as A. E. Waite (1925), have argued that Masonic
initiation practices are based on the concept of memory,
symbolically enacting what today could be described as
the psychological processes involved in memory loss
and retrieval. Here, the allegorical legend of Hiram
Abif, which was introduced into the second edition
of the Masonic Book of Constitutions in 1738, may
be a case in point. It is enacted in the third or Master
Mason degree (‘Masonic Miscellanies: The Legend of
the Third Degree’, 2025).
1 ‘Side degrees’ were unofficial meetings of fraternities aimed at
entertainment, rather than ritual purposes. They were popular in the first
half of the twentieth century, and companies arose to supply the fraternities
with paraphernalia and costumes for their hijinks and terrifying ordeals for
the blindfolded initiates. The DeMoulin Bros &Co in the US was one such
company. Its 1908 catalogue depicts their equipment, sometimes described
as ‘only an innocent joke’.
Lynn Brunet |Ripping back the veil on Masonic abuse
turned upside down, and the everyday laws of morality
are derided. Turner (1982) describes the initiates in
these rites as being taught ‘that they did not know what
they thought they knew. Beneath the surface structure
of custom was a deep structure, whose rules they had to
learn, through paradox and shock’ (p. 42). Non-Western
secret societies have traditionally been associated with
these practices and incorporate death-and-rebirth
symbolism into their initiations (Eliade, 1995). In his
study of Mozart’s involvement in Freemasonry, Paul
Nettl (1987) suggests that these primordial practices
may have been the original basis for modern Western
secret societies, which in turn led to the elaborate and
formalised rituals of the institution of Freemasonry in
the eighteenth century (p. 93).
Four out of the five case studies here have known
or likely family connections to the Masonic Order
(Cronin, 1997, p. 9 Fitzpatrick, 2005 J. Golding,
2012, p. 53 Jung, 1963, p. 220). Freemasonry, as the
Encyclopædia Britannica (2026) describes it, is:
the teachings and practices of the fraternal (men
only) order of Free and Accepted Masons, the
largest worldwide secret society...spread by the
advance of the British Empire and remaining
most popular in the British Isles and other
countries originally within the empire.
However, the extent to which Freemasonry can be
described as secret is debatable, given the three centuries’
worth of literature, exploring its beliefs, practices and
symbolism, even including reproductions of some of
the rituals, so that research into it is far easier than
into many other groups. The first three degrees with
which the Masonic journey begins, known as Craft
or Blue Masonry, are the Entered Apprentice, Fellow
Craft and Master Mason degrees (Duncan, 1866).
Every Mason who wants to progress further into one
of the other Masonic Rites (sometimes called higher
degrees) must first undergo these three Craft degrees.
All degrees involve rituals, many of them loosely
based on biblical themes, allegorical tales, and moral
lessons, and often include oaths of secrecy, while the
initiates are sometimes blindfolded. Solomon’s temple
is a central theme and symbolises the individual’s
spiritual life. In the second or Fellow Craft degree, the
building of this temple symbolises the initiate’s own
inner process of gradual spiritual development. The
rituals involve a physical enactment of the narratives
within the lodge room and express a search for ‘light’,
understood as philosophical, spiritual, or mystical
illumination (Duncan, 1866). The organisation aims to
chart a course of spiritual and moral development for
the betterment of its members.
However, the Masonic Order has long been aware
of the potential misuse of its rituals and calls these
corrupt versions ‘spurious Freemasonry’, ‘irregular
practice’, ‘Hedge Masons’ and ‘side degrees’ (Lawrence,
1924, p. 190 Roberts, 1974, p. 28 Universal Co-
Masonry, 2026).1 These practices are not sanctioned by
the various Grand Lodges, but they can nevertheless
appear within some fraternal contexts as distorted
versions of the approved rituals. The potential for abuse
of the initiates is one of the attributes of older versions
of the degrees. Reports of abuse in Masonic contexts
or misuse of Masonic rituals or regalia have appeared
regularly in the literature of ritual abuse (Brunet, 2007
Katchen, 1992, p. 10 Kent, 1993, 1998 Schröder et al,
2020 Scott, 2001, p. 127). The sociologist Stephen Kent
(1993, 1998) used the term deviant Freemasonry in the
context of allegations of ritual abuse in North America
by individuals whose fathers were Freemasons. But as
far as this author is aware, the Order has not publicly
admitted to the use of Masonic rites for child abuse.
This author has suggested that since the eighteenth
century, the Masonic Order may have been ritually
enacting trauma on the body and psyche, centuries
before it was discussed in modern psychology and
psychiatry (Brunet, 2007). Some Masonic authors,
such as A. E. Waite (1925), have argued that Masonic
initiation practices are based on the concept of memory,
symbolically enacting what today could be described as
the psychological processes involved in memory loss
and retrieval. Here, the allegorical legend of Hiram
Abif, which was introduced into the second edition
of the Masonic Book of Constitutions in 1738, may
be a case in point. It is enacted in the third or Master
Mason degree (‘Masonic Miscellanies: The Legend of
the Third Degree’, 2025).
1 ‘Side degrees’ were unofficial meetings of fraternities aimed at
entertainment, rather than ritual purposes. They were popular in the first
half of the twentieth century, and companies arose to supply the fraternities
with paraphernalia and costumes for their hijinks and terrifying ordeals for
the blindfolded initiates. The DeMoulin Bros &Co in the US was one such
company. Its 1908 catalogue depicts their equipment, sometimes described
as ‘only an innocent joke’.









































































































