Cultic Studies Journal, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1991, Page 44
Not being content with this factual error enclosed within an argumentum ad
hominem, the report‟s authors follow it up with the very serious charge that Terry
illegally obtained, and then withheld, evidence in the much-publicized Lisa Steinberg
murder case. The report refers to Terry‟s acknowledgement on the Geraldo Rivera
Show that he possessed Hedda Nussbaum‟s appointment diary. The authors then
state that they called the New York City District Attorney‟s Office on October 2,
1988, and “were told that, if Terry‟s claim was indeed true, he would be guilty of
withholding evidence in a murder case -a crime.” The truth, as the authors could
have learned by contacting Maury Terry themselves, is that Terry was in the
Steinberg apartment after the police released it from crime scene status. With Joel
Steinberg‟s permission, in the company of Steinberg‟s attorney, and with the
knowledge of the police, Terry took the appointment book. If this was an illegal act,
why hasn‟t Terry been arrested? Terry has also pointed out to us that documents
going back to the early 1980‟s, in Hedda Nussbaum‟s handwriting, demonstrate that
Hedda was involved in cultic activities that overlapped with child pornography. The
police are currently in possession of these documents.
These examples underscore the report‟s failure to abide by its authors‟ criteria for
responsible commentary. The examples also undercut their claim to the valid use of
Ockham‟s Razor. This leaves their intentions suspect. The selective scholarship which marks
the Introduction dominates and distorts the reports main sections as well, and we have
many questions about the bulk of the report‟s other claims and assertions. For one thing,
the authors combine their selective scholarship with a guilt-by-association maneuver. After
soundly berating several individuals who are widely considered to be charlatans, the report
then attempts to claim that their chicanery contaminates everyone who criticizes Satanism‟s
spread. But these individuals are not representative of all those who are willing to speak out
on this topic. For another, the report‟s discussion of their generic topics -Satanism,
Witchcraft, Child Abuse, and related criminal activities -is simply too disingenuous.
CSER Error Number One: Wicca and Other Occult Religions
In their section on “Wicca and Other “Occult” Religions,” the authors attempt to portray
Witchcraft and other forms of neo-pagan religion, as well as Native American Religion, and
Santeria, Voodoo, Palo Mayombe, and other African- Caribbean-American religions, as
entirely benevolent and innocent (while characterizing Evangelical Christianity as vicious,
intolerant, and superstitious). However, the authors overlook the fact that the concept of
“black magic” appears in some form in virtually all of these religions. In keeping with its
consistent use of its original straw man, the International Satan-worshipping Conspiracy,
the report flatly states that Wicca has .nothing to do with the Devil.” This assertion, because
it appears in conjunction with a blanket claim incorporating several religions, cannot go
unchallenged. Satanic religion, “devil worship,” and Wicca all rely upon a central religious
experience which, despite variations in perspective, reflects a uniform underlying impulse
and belief system. The report completely misses the point that what ties these religions
together, and sets them apart from Biblical theology, is their reliance upon theological
concepts derived from Animism. What the ancient Greeks meant by their word (entheos),
the root of our word enthusiasm, entails a necessarily passive state of mind without which
the rituals lose their power. While the individual religions do have varying applications of
this core belief, the principle is uniform. A deity, it is believed, can be drawn into the
person, or self, of an individual, or the selves of a group, and thereby redirect the
perceptions, convictions, and actions according to the wishes of the deity. The subsequent
and perceptible shifts are accepted as the palpable signs of the deity‟s presence. This is
what these people believe happens, and, via the necessary reification of their own
sensations, what they worship. In Wicca, for example, the sought-for shift largely affects
the sexual realm.
Not being content with this factual error enclosed within an argumentum ad
hominem, the report‟s authors follow it up with the very serious charge that Terry
illegally obtained, and then withheld, evidence in the much-publicized Lisa Steinberg
murder case. The report refers to Terry‟s acknowledgement on the Geraldo Rivera
Show that he possessed Hedda Nussbaum‟s appointment diary. The authors then
state that they called the New York City District Attorney‟s Office on October 2,
1988, and “were told that, if Terry‟s claim was indeed true, he would be guilty of
withholding evidence in a murder case -a crime.” The truth, as the authors could
have learned by contacting Maury Terry themselves, is that Terry was in the
Steinberg apartment after the police released it from crime scene status. With Joel
Steinberg‟s permission, in the company of Steinberg‟s attorney, and with the
knowledge of the police, Terry took the appointment book. If this was an illegal act,
why hasn‟t Terry been arrested? Terry has also pointed out to us that documents
going back to the early 1980‟s, in Hedda Nussbaum‟s handwriting, demonstrate that
Hedda was involved in cultic activities that overlapped with child pornography. The
police are currently in possession of these documents.
These examples underscore the report‟s failure to abide by its authors‟ criteria for
responsible commentary. The examples also undercut their claim to the valid use of
Ockham‟s Razor. This leaves their intentions suspect. The selective scholarship which marks
the Introduction dominates and distorts the reports main sections as well, and we have
many questions about the bulk of the report‟s other claims and assertions. For one thing,
the authors combine their selective scholarship with a guilt-by-association maneuver. After
soundly berating several individuals who are widely considered to be charlatans, the report
then attempts to claim that their chicanery contaminates everyone who criticizes Satanism‟s
spread. But these individuals are not representative of all those who are willing to speak out
on this topic. For another, the report‟s discussion of their generic topics -Satanism,
Witchcraft, Child Abuse, and related criminal activities -is simply too disingenuous.
CSER Error Number One: Wicca and Other Occult Religions
In their section on “Wicca and Other “Occult” Religions,” the authors attempt to portray
Witchcraft and other forms of neo-pagan religion, as well as Native American Religion, and
Santeria, Voodoo, Palo Mayombe, and other African- Caribbean-American religions, as
entirely benevolent and innocent (while characterizing Evangelical Christianity as vicious,
intolerant, and superstitious). However, the authors overlook the fact that the concept of
“black magic” appears in some form in virtually all of these religions. In keeping with its
consistent use of its original straw man, the International Satan-worshipping Conspiracy,
the report flatly states that Wicca has .nothing to do with the Devil.” This assertion, because
it appears in conjunction with a blanket claim incorporating several religions, cannot go
unchallenged. Satanic religion, “devil worship,” and Wicca all rely upon a central religious
experience which, despite variations in perspective, reflects a uniform underlying impulse
and belief system. The report completely misses the point that what ties these religions
together, and sets them apart from Biblical theology, is their reliance upon theological
concepts derived from Animism. What the ancient Greeks meant by their word (entheos),
the root of our word enthusiasm, entails a necessarily passive state of mind without which
the rituals lose their power. While the individual religions do have varying applications of
this core belief, the principle is uniform. A deity, it is believed, can be drawn into the
person, or self, of an individual, or the selves of a group, and thereby redirect the
perceptions, convictions, and actions according to the wishes of the deity. The subsequent
and perceptible shifts are accepted as the palpable signs of the deity‟s presence. This is
what these people believe happens, and, via the necessary reification of their own
sensations, what they worship. In Wicca, for example, the sought-for shift largely affects
the sexual realm.




















































































































