Cultic Studies Journal, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1991, Page 102
Table 2
School officials’ determination of incident’s actual link to ritual activity
Status of individual Percentage of total reports
Alleged perpetrators 84%
Adjudicated perpetrators 5%
Victims 17%
Both* 4%
*Denotes individuals who were subjected to but also perpetrated ritual crime. Percentages
exceed 100 since some respondents reported in more than one category.
Table 3
Number of reports, distributed between property crimes and crimes against persons
Frequency of re-
ports
Divisions
reporting crimes
against persons
Divisions
reporting crimes
against property
None 30 29
1-5 0 1
6-10 0 0
11-15 0 0
16-25 0 0
Over 25 0 0
Table 2
School officials’ determination of incident’s actual link to ritual activity
Status of individual Percentage of total reports
Alleged perpetrators 84%
Adjudicated perpetrators 5%
Victims 17%
Both* 4%
*Denotes individuals who were subjected to but also perpetrated ritual crime. Percentages
exceed 100 since some respondents reported in more than one category.
Table 3
Number of reports, distributed between property crimes and crimes against persons
Frequency of re-
ports
Divisions
reporting crimes
against persons
Divisions
reporting crimes
against property
None 30 29
1-5 0 1
6-10 0 0
11-15 0 0
16-25 0 0
Over 25 0 0




















































































































