Cultic Studies Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2009, Page 18
Richardson, J. T. (1985). Psychological and psychiatric studies of new religions. In L. B. Brown (Ed.),
Advances in the psychology of religion (209–223). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
Richardson, J. T. (1995). Clinical and Personality Assessment of Participants in New Religions.
International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 5, 145–170.
Richardson, J. T., &van Driel, B. (1984). Public support for anti-cult legislation. Journal for the
Scientific Study of Religion, 23, 412–418.
Robbins, T., &Anthony, D. (1982). Deprogramming, brainwashing and the medicalization of deviant
religious groups. Social Problems, 29, 283–297.
Rodríguez, C., &Almendros, C. (2005). Ladrones de Libertad. Pseudoterapias “religiosas” New Age.
Madrid: Ediciones Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Rodríguez, P. (1994). Tu hijo y las sectas. Madrid: Ed. Temas de Hoy.
Saliba, J. A. (1993). The new religions and mental health. In D. G. Bromley &J. K. Hadden (Eds.),
Religion and the social order. The handbook on cults and sects in America (99-113). Vol. 3, part
B. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Shupe, A. D., &Bromley, D. G. (1980). The new vigilantes: Deprogrammers, anticultists and the new
religions. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Singer, M. T., &Ofshe, R. (1990). Thought reform programs and the production of psychiatric
casualties. Psychiatric Annals, 20, 188–193.
Skonovd, N. (1983). Leaving the cultic milieu. In D. Bromley &J. Richardson (Eds.), The
brainwashing/deprogramming controversy (91–105). New York: Edwin Mellen.
Solomon, T. (1981). Integrating the ‗Moonie‘ experience: A survey of ex-members of the Unification
Church. In T. Robbins &D. Anthony (Eds.), In gods we trust (275–295). New Brunswick, NJ:
Transaction.
Spilka, B., Hood, R. W. Jr., Hunsberger, B., &Gorsuch, R. (2003). The psychology of religion: An
empirical approach (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Swartling, G., &Swartling, P. G. (1992). Psychiatric problems in ex-members of Word of Life. Cultic
Studies Journal, 9, 78–88.
Tobias, M. L., &Lalich, J. (1994). Captive hearts, captive minds: Freedom and recovery from cults and
abusive relationships. Alameda, CA: Hunter House.
West, L. J. (1990). Persuasive techniques in contemporary cults: A public health approach. Cultic
Studies Journal, 7, 126–149.
Winocur, N. (1996). The assessment of cult involvement and its relationship to psychological distress
in former cult members (Doctoral dissertation, Pepperdine University at Culver City, CA, 1995).
Dissertation Abstracts International, 56 (11B), 6413.
Wright, S. A. (1983). Defection from new religious movements: A test of some theoretical
propositions. In D. G. Bromley &J. T. Richardson (Eds.), The brainwashing/deprogramming
controversy (106–121). New York: Edwin Mellen Press.
Wright, S. A. (1984). Post-involvement attitudes of voluntary defectors from new religious
movements. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 23, 172–182.
Wright, S. A. (1987). Leaving cults. The dynamics of defection. Washington, DC: Society for the
Scientific Study of Religion.
Wright, S. A. (1998). Exploring factors that shape the apostate role. In D. G. Bromley (Ed.), The
politics of religious apostasy (95–114). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Wright, S. A., &Ebaugh, H. R. (1993). Leaving new religions. In D. G. Bromley, &J. K. Hadden (Eds.),
Religion and the social order. The handbook on cults and sects in America (117–138). Vol. 3, part
A. Greenwich, CT.: JAI Press.
Wright, S. A., &Piper, E. S. (1986). Families and cults: Familial factors related to youth leaving or
remaining in deviant religious groups. Journal of Marriage &the Family, 48, 15–25.
Zablocki, B. (1997). The blacklisting of a concept: The strange history of the brainwashing conjecture
in the sociology of religion. Nova Religio, 1, 96–121.
Zablocki, B. (1998). Exit cost analysis: A new approach to the scientific study of brainwashing. Nova
Religio, 1, 216–249.
Zablocki, B. (2001). Toward a demystified and disinterested scientific theory of brainwashing. In B.
Zablocki &T. Robbins (Eds.), Misunderstanding cults: Searching for objectivity in a controversial
field (159–214). Canada: University of Toronto Press.
Previous Page Next Page