Cultic Studies Journal, Volume 17, 2000, Page 23
The room explodes in loud applause. Cries of ―Hail Victory!” Cries of “White
Power!”‟
Such gatherings display all the colors of a cult in full bloom. The group dynamics are
calculated to induce maximum conformity. Thus, the Congress observed by Ezekiel was held
at a compound in Hayden Lake, away from any outside scrutiny or the possibility of
corrective influence from anyone unimpressed by supremacist theology. A sign near the
entrance read ―Aryans Only,‖ setting a tone of exclusivity from the beginning. All new
arrivals had their credentials checked by guards posted at the entrance. The message was:
this is a gathering only for the initiated, the trusted, the select few. Nazi music played
throughout the weekend, broadcast from loudspeakers located in a convenient watchtower.
Participants were afforded no escape from an incessant message of hate. Nazi flags were
prominently displayed, while all arrivals found themselves quickly habituated to the frequent
exchange of Nazi salutes. Research has generally found that people adopt the norms, dress
codes, linguistic forms, and behaviors of groups to which they commit with astonishing ease
(Brown, 2000). Meanwhile, an endless succession of speakers pounded away at the same
message: the Jewish threat is moving towards conclusion blacks are gaining power
everywhere the US Government is in the pay of the conspiracy. The refrain is relentless:
―White Power! White Power! White Power!‖ For those present, the return trip to reality
must be traumatic.
Self-righteousness is deepened by yet another paradox. On the one hand, the sufferings of
the stigmatised out-groups are described as non-existent. On the other hand, the members
of such groups are themselves blamed for any problems that are reluctantly acknowledged
to exist.
Again, this problem extends beyond those who belong to hate groups. It is a fundamental
component of a prejudiced mindset. For example, two researchers investigated white
stereotypes of African Americans, Hispanic Americans, and Asian Americans (Bobo &
Kluegel, 1991). They found that whites needed to ―explain‖ the disadvantaged condition of
the minority being observedmore precisely, to find explanations which justified it. Many
alternative explanations for black disadvantage are available (for example, that the
disadvantage is primarily the product of white prejudice and discrimination). However, to
accept this would require self-criticism, and criticism might in turn be extended to social
institutions with which many whites identify more closely than do members of minority
groups. It was found that whites tended to assume a casual connection between the
stereotypical traits ascribed to the minority groups and their social situation: that is, it was
their own fault. In short, it was much more convenient to assume that their position of
social disadvantage reflected their naturally inferior position than discrimination practised by
the white society. We would describe this as a perspective of ―illusory causality.‖ Clearly,
the tendency to blame those at the receiving end of bias for its effects is particularly
pronounced among members of extreme hate groups. The effect is to promote in-group
favoritism (i.e., a belief in the innate superiority of the group to which one belongs),
combined with out-group stigmatisation (i.e., a belief in the innate inferiority of the
designated out-groups). It would appear that such psychological dynamics are a necessary
ingredient for the development of cultic organizations, driven as they are by an exclusive
sense of mission that separates their followers from all other groups in society. Such
separation is most easily accomplished if the members can be convinced that they are both
different from and superior to other groups with whom they come in contact.
The apocalyptic ideas that go with this mindset were greatly strengthened in the post-war
period by the existence of the Soviet Union. One Identity writer, Bertrand Comparet,
described the imminent Final Days (and they are always depicted as imminentdecade
after decade) in the following terms:
The room explodes in loud applause. Cries of ―Hail Victory!” Cries of “White
Power!”‟
Such gatherings display all the colors of a cult in full bloom. The group dynamics are
calculated to induce maximum conformity. Thus, the Congress observed by Ezekiel was held
at a compound in Hayden Lake, away from any outside scrutiny or the possibility of
corrective influence from anyone unimpressed by supremacist theology. A sign near the
entrance read ―Aryans Only,‖ setting a tone of exclusivity from the beginning. All new
arrivals had their credentials checked by guards posted at the entrance. The message was:
this is a gathering only for the initiated, the trusted, the select few. Nazi music played
throughout the weekend, broadcast from loudspeakers located in a convenient watchtower.
Participants were afforded no escape from an incessant message of hate. Nazi flags were
prominently displayed, while all arrivals found themselves quickly habituated to the frequent
exchange of Nazi salutes. Research has generally found that people adopt the norms, dress
codes, linguistic forms, and behaviors of groups to which they commit with astonishing ease
(Brown, 2000). Meanwhile, an endless succession of speakers pounded away at the same
message: the Jewish threat is moving towards conclusion blacks are gaining power
everywhere the US Government is in the pay of the conspiracy. The refrain is relentless:
―White Power! White Power! White Power!‖ For those present, the return trip to reality
must be traumatic.
Self-righteousness is deepened by yet another paradox. On the one hand, the sufferings of
the stigmatised out-groups are described as non-existent. On the other hand, the members
of such groups are themselves blamed for any problems that are reluctantly acknowledged
to exist.
Again, this problem extends beyond those who belong to hate groups. It is a fundamental
component of a prejudiced mindset. For example, two researchers investigated white
stereotypes of African Americans, Hispanic Americans, and Asian Americans (Bobo &
Kluegel, 1991). They found that whites needed to ―explain‖ the disadvantaged condition of
the minority being observedmore precisely, to find explanations which justified it. Many
alternative explanations for black disadvantage are available (for example, that the
disadvantage is primarily the product of white prejudice and discrimination). However, to
accept this would require self-criticism, and criticism might in turn be extended to social
institutions with which many whites identify more closely than do members of minority
groups. It was found that whites tended to assume a casual connection between the
stereotypical traits ascribed to the minority groups and their social situation: that is, it was
their own fault. In short, it was much more convenient to assume that their position of
social disadvantage reflected their naturally inferior position than discrimination practised by
the white society. We would describe this as a perspective of ―illusory causality.‖ Clearly,
the tendency to blame those at the receiving end of bias for its effects is particularly
pronounced among members of extreme hate groups. The effect is to promote in-group
favoritism (i.e., a belief in the innate superiority of the group to which one belongs),
combined with out-group stigmatisation (i.e., a belief in the innate inferiority of the
designated out-groups). It would appear that such psychological dynamics are a necessary
ingredient for the development of cultic organizations, driven as they are by an exclusive
sense of mission that separates their followers from all other groups in society. Such
separation is most easily accomplished if the members can be convinced that they are both
different from and superior to other groups with whom they come in contact.
The apocalyptic ideas that go with this mindset were greatly strengthened in the post-war
period by the existence of the Soviet Union. One Identity writer, Bertrand Comparet,
described the imminent Final Days (and they are always depicted as imminentdecade
after decade) in the following terms:
















































































































































