Cultic Studies Review, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2003, Page 74
cult to the Book of Revelation. To quote Adela Yarbro Collins, "The dualist division of
humanity in the Apocalypse is a failure in love. [...]One's enemies, including large
numbers of unknown people with whom one supposes oneself to be in disagreement, are
given a simple label, associated with demonic beings, and thus denied their full humanity"
(170). After the events of 9/11 this assessment rings more true than ever:
In-group morality [in Al Qaeda] was emphasized there is no moral obligation to those
outside the Ummah, or indeed to other Muslims outside the group. [...]Secularists and
disbelievers are not even considered living. Mahmud Abouhalima, involved in the first World
Trade Center bombing, described non-religious individuals as moving ―dead bodies‖
(Christopher M. Centner).
Neo and Trinity have a stone-faced attitude toward murdering innocent security men in The
Matrix. They kill as if they were part of an action cartoon with no emotion, no regret, no
sense that (and this might have been somewhat mitigating) this murder is a horrible
necessity. Trinity especially tends to move like a machine as she shoots people at
pointblank range, puts knives in their foreheads and mutilates men who are convinced they
are fighting dangerous terrorists the way real-life police officers would risk their lives to
protect innocent civilians from... Al Qaeda! In The Matrix Reloaded the same approach to
murdering unknowing security people is observed. After captain Niobe attacks and
neutralizes a couple of policemen, her head shoots up in a jerky motion as if to stress the
idea of a superhero's job well-done. Equally disturbing is the way in which a power plant
is blown up right in the middle of a city in The Matrix Reloaded the implicit countless
civilian victims within the explosion radius are discounted by the film as not even worth
thinking about.
Christopher M. Centner's above-cited reference to "in-group morality," which amounts to
the willingness to "trash" anyone in the out-group, is a position typical of aggressive cults
and terrorist organizations with cult-like elements. This can be linked to Lawrence
Kohlberg's discussion of moral development stages across cultures. Kohlberg outlines six
stages through which a human being can progress in his or her conception of what is right
and wrong. The first two stages are pre-social in that they make the creation of stable
social units impossible and characterize mainly young children or psychopaths. Thus, stage
one is about the simple avoidance of punishment while stage two is the conception of other
people only in terms of what they can give in exchange for something (Lawrence Kohlberg:
17). It is only with stage three that a rudimentary social structure can emerge — on the
basis of in-group and out-group morality. The in-group tends to be a smaller interest
group, like a tribe, where justice is defined in terms of approval from the in-group. Such a
position makes the creation of larger social structures problematic because the members of
the in-group identify with a narrow range of goals rather than a broad social system that
incorporates many interest groups or "tribes." (cf. Lawrence Kohlberg, p. 18-21)
The members of Morpheus's rebel group appear to function at the level of Lawrence
Kohlberg's third stage, and in this connection the parallels with cultic thinking appear very
prominent. Since this morality violates that of mainstream society and age-old traditions,
cults tend to focus on the figure of a charismatic leader in order to bolster their shaky
ethical systems. In fact this goes back to medieval millenarian sects that normally
centered around a prophet-like person or propheta (Cohn 43). Such a leader declared all
conventional norms invalid and sanctioned violence meant to usher in the Millennium.
Modern cultic leaders function the same way, e.g., Jim Jones and David Koresh claimed
divine status and absolute trust as well as the absolute right to rule the in-group as they
saw fit (cf. David G. Bromley and Edward D. Silver 44: 58).
In The Matrix Morpheus is undoubtedly a prophet-like leader modeled on John the Baptist
(see above). His superhuman nature is suggested in a scene from The Matrix Reloaded
Cultic Studies Review, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2003, Page 75
where the ship's operator Link appears fearful of what is to come. The situation seems to
be such that Morpheus's actions imperil the rebel group and all of awakened humanity.
Instead of justifying his position by logical reasoning, Morpheus simply tells Link: "Trust
me." In other words, Morpheus's authority is inspired/divine rather than human and open
to questioning. To follow Morpheus is to believe in him. In fact reliance on belief, rather
than logic, is what characterizes Morpheus and his relationship with the other rebels.
Morpheus repeatedly talks not about what he knows or has experienced, but what he
believes to be true. And the suspension of critical thinking is a sine qua non in the
relationship between a modern cult's membership and its leader.
Morpheus's special status is illustrated by the lobby shooting spree and the rooftop rescue in
The Matrix. How does Neo justify the murder of many innocent people in the office tower
during his attempt to save Morpheus? Morpheus knows the codes for accessing Zion, and,
as Tank tells Neo, in the interests of awakened humanity, Morpheus's body should be
disconnected and therefore killed before the agents pry the information out of his residual
image. Therefore, the willingness to use "guns, lots of guns" against the security men
cannot be justified even in terms of the rebel's practical goals. The justification for the
ruthless rescue rests on Morpheus's special, semi-divine nature so typical of modern and
medieval cult leaders. The welfare of the divine individual is by definition greater than that
of ordinary humans (awakened or not). After all, the policemen killed by Neo and Trinity
are just a bunch of coppertops whose value pales in comparison to that of a prophet.
None of this is to suggest that the cultic model appears as an intentional semiotic structure
of The Matrix and The Matrix Reloaded. Many critics have pointed out that the Wachowski
brothers were very deliberate in imbuing the film with Buddhist and other traditionally
positive religious overtones. For example, this is how the directors sum up the film's
implications in an interview:
We‘re interested in mythology, theology and, to a certain extent, higher-level mathematics.
All are ways human beings try to answer bigger questions, as well as The Big Question. If
you‘re going to do epic stories, you should concern yourself with those issues. People might
not understand all the allusions in the movie, but they understand the important ideas. We
wanted to make people think, engage their minds a bit (Quoted in James L. Ford, 22).
And indeed, it would be absolutely wrong to suggest that the Wachowskis fail in their
attempt to convey such philosophic ideas. The obvious presence of the intended message
explains the interest that this "action" film has aroused in the academic and philosophic
community. The problem appears to be that the unintended cultic subtext is there at the
same time as the intended subtext. And the result is a mix of discourses which amounts to
a cacophony of values. Jim Jones, Bruce Lee and Buddha appear together on the same
stage and inevitably sing out of tune. There is no denying that the bad guys are
absolutely bad in The Matrix and in The Matrix Reloaded. The problem is that that the good
guys are not good enough.
Works Cited
Bromley, David G. and Edward D. Silver. "The Davidian Tradition: From Paternal Clan to
Prophetic Movement." In Stuart A. Wright Ed. Critical Perspectives on the Branch
Davidian Conflict. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1995, 43-
72.
Centner, Christopher M. "Cults and Terrorism: Similarities and Differences." Cultic Studies
Review 2.2 (2003): http://www.cultsandsociety.com/csr_issues/csr_toc2003.2.htm
(no paragraph numeration).
Cohn, Norman. The Pursuit of the Millennium. New York: Harper and Row, 1961.
Collins, Adela Yarbro. Crisis and Catharsis: The Power of the Apocalypse. Philadelphia: The
Westminster Press, 1984.
Previous Page Next Page