Cultic Studies Journal, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1991, Page 53
constitutionally protected conduct) or Bear v. Reformed Mennonite Church, 341 A.2d
105 (1975) (religion may be civilly liable to shunned former member because shunning
must yield to compelling state interest in protecting family relations).
61. Telephone interview with Ford Greene, July 30, 1990.
*************
Acknowledgement
This article first appeared in the February 1991 issue of The Los Angeles Lawyer. It is
reprinted with permission. Frank H. Free, a legal assistant in San Francisco, contributed
research to this article. The abstract was written by the CSJ‟s Editor.
***************
Sarah Van Hoey is a freelance writer and legal assistant in the San Francisco Bay area.
This article is an electronic version of an article originally published in Cultic Studies Journal, 1991, Volume 8,
Number 1, pages 61-79. Please keep in mind that the pagination of this electronic reprint differs from that of the
bound volume. This fact could affect how you enter bibliographic information in papers that you may write.
Previous Page Next Page