Cultic Studies Journal, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1991, Page 14
federal and state authorities.”72 A revised version of that code was discussed at Boston
University, under the leadership of the Reverend Robert Thornburg, Dean of Marsh Chapel,
and approved as an official statement by the Boston University Christian Chaplains on June
21, 1988.73
The Catholic Church has also been forced to differentiate its legitimate splinter groups from
destructive religious cults in order to insure that its own behavior does not become cult-like.
Pointing out the Vatican Council II Declaration on Religious Liberty and its Decree on
Missionary Activity, Father James LeBar asserts that while “groups have a right to seek new
members … they have no right to use deception, high pressure, and guilt to force the
decision of an individual.”74
In the nineteenth century the Church stepped in to correct the results of “excessive
proselytizing” by Theodore Ratisbonne, a Jewish convert to Catholicism75 when he used
deceptive means to baptize Jewish children without their parents‟ knowledge or consent.76
Today the Church has to grapple with accusations that the fervently religious Catholic
organization, Opus Dei, is a cult.77 In December, 1981 Basil Cardinal Hume issued
guidelines for that group in his Archdiocese in Great Britain, stating that no one under
eighteen years of age should be allowed to make a long-term commitment to Opus Dei, the
commitment should be first discussed with parent or guardians, the individual must be free
to leave the organization and to choose his or her own spiritual director, and the group‟s
sponsorship and management should be made clear.78 And on November 4, 1986, the late
Bishop of Brooklyn, Francis John Mugavero, released a “Declaration Concerning the Bayside
Movement,” which discusses the claims that a Queens, New York woman, Veronica Leuken,
has been witnessing apparitions of the Virgin Mary during “vigils” in Flushing Meadow Park.
Bishop Mugavero instructs that the visions are not authentic and legitimate Church authority
does not condone participation in these “vigils” or disseminating or reading literature about
them.79
Mainstream Study and Action
The cult phenomenon has stirred many religious leaders to carefully study the new religious
movements. In 1983 an International Conference on Destructive Cults in Linz, Austria
sponsored by the Lutheran Church of Austria drew prominent Church leader-participants
from Western Europe.80 The Church of England instituted an investigation of the London-
based cult-like School of Economic Science in 1983 after complaints were aired at the
Church‟s General Synod81 and received from clergy in several other countries.82 Prominent
clergy and religious studies academicians have participated in sociological conferences on
cults such as that held at the Continuing Education Center at the University of Nebraska in
March of 1984.83 Many attended the conference entitled, “Cultism: A Conference for
Scholars and Policy Makers” sponsored by the American Family Foundation, the
Neuropsychiatric Institute of the University of California at Los Angeles, and The Johnson
Foundation, which was held at the Johnson Foundation‟s Wingspread Conference Center in
Racine, Wisconsin in September, 1985.84
Concern about the dangers of cults to their members and to a democratic society has
prompted some religious leaders to embark on aggressive programs to counter them. In
December of 1976, officials of the American Jewish Committee, The National Council of
Churches, and the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York held a joint press conference
declaring the Unification Church and Sun Myung Moon‟s writings to be “anti-democratic,
anti-Jewish, and in direct conflict with basic Christian teaching.”85 In July, 1982, the
Interfaith Coalition of Concern about Cults, which sponsors seminars and conferences for
clergy and lay people and for the media, was organized. Members include the Greek
Orthodox Archdiocese of North America and South America, the Jewish Community
Relations Council of New York City (an umbrella group of Jewish organizations including the
Cultic Studies Journal, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1991, Page 15
New York Board of Rabbis), the Queens Federation of Churches, the Roman Catholic
Archdiocese of New York, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, and the Council of
Churches of the City of New York.86 In 1986 religious leaders in Miami, Florida established
an interfaith council there.87
Although most Jewish leaders feel more must be done, the Jewish community has been
actively trying to meet the challenge of cults through educational and counseling efforts.
The Jewish Community Relations Council of New York City sponsors a Task Force on
Missionaries and Cults. It is a major resource center, convenes conferences on cults for the
Jewish community at large, rabbis, college administrators, guidance counselors, parents of
cult members, mental health professionals, and Hillel workers, and helps educate the Israeli
public, government, and press about the cult problem there. The Jewish Board of Family
and Children‟s Services in New York City and the JCRC Task Force co-sponsor a twenty-four
hour Cult Hotline and Crisis Clinic offering counseling by trained mental health professionals
to both Jewish and non-Jewish past and present cult members and their families.88 The
Union of American Hebrew Congregations established a National Committee on Cults and
Missionaries89, and the Central Conference of American Rabbis prepared a study kit for
rabbis.90
In Philadelphia the JCRC sponsors a cult task force, and the Federation of Jewish
Philanthropies funds a Jewish Campus Activities Board. The Commission on Cults and
Missionary Efforts of the Jewish Federation Council of Greater Los Angeles has presented a
series of national seminars to discuss cults and the legal system. The Greater Miami Jewish
Federation‟s Committee on Cults and Missionaries has developed a widely-used high school
cult curriculum. The Columbus, Ohio Federation funds The Leo Yaffenoff Jewish Center, and
the JCRC there sponsors a Task Force and Missionary Committee. In Baltimore, the Jewish
Federation and the Jewish Community Center sponsored Project Yedid. Jews for Judaism is
located in Baltimore, Los Angeles, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and Israel. There is a Jews for
Judaism in Miami (separate from the above-mentioned group of the same name), the
Jewish Family Institute in Brooklyn, the B‟nai B‟rith-sponsored Cult project in Montreal,
Canada, The Jewish Center in Balaclava, Victoria, Australia, Concerned Parents Against Cults
in Haifa, and Yad L‟Achim in Jerusalem.91 The Israeli Minister of Education appointed an
Intergovernmental Committee on Cult Activities, the summary report of which has been
published in Vol. 6, No. 1 (1989) of this journal.
In 1985 a conference of Catholic Bishops in Japan issued a statement that the Unification
Church is not a Christian organization and warned Catholics there not to participate in its
activities.92 In the United States for many years only a handful of priests and Catholic lay
people expressed concern about cults, and just a few cult-education curricula were
produced by individual priests.93 Although the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York and
the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn did join the Interfaith Coalition of Concern about
Cults, official Vatican sanction for these counter-cult activities came only with the release of
the May, 1986 Vatican Report on Cults. While Catholic counter-cultists strongly welcome
the Vatican report, they maintain that since many Vatican statements go unread and since
today so many Catholics question the authority of the Pope on every issue, the report has
not yet awakened many Catholics to the cult problem.94
To date the liberal Protestant community has done little officially to respond to cults. Dean
Kelley says that when he tried to organize a project about six years ago to develop dialogue
between cult members and their families, it “never got off the ground because of opposition
from some National Council of Churches members who felt such a program would dignify
cults. And they felt these issues could best be handled by the various denominations.”95
Kelley also points out that since the NCC has a strong civil libertarian stance, it opposes the
adjudication of cult-related cases in law courts.96
Previous Page Next Page