22
next task was to update the concept to make it relevant for
victims of government-sponsored experimentation, cult
survivors, and others who had suffered harm. He struggled
with this thorny problem until…Doris Day came to the rescue!
Who else but Alan Scheflin could give you Doris Day in the
middle of Dante’s inferno?
It was while watching an old Doris Day/Clark Gable movie,
Teacher’s Pet (1958), that he was inspired with the idea of
how to make the extremely difficult-to-prove cause of undue
influence understandable to both judges and juries. Only
a brilliant mind such as his could hit upon such a simple,
explanatory tool. Alan realized that lawyers could use the basic
journalistic technique of establishing the who, what, where,
when, why, and how of a situation in court to prove harm in
cases in which undue influence had occurred. This insight
changed things completely and represented a quantum leap
forward in the ability of victims to secure justice.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Since his first introduction to the terrible reality of mind
manipulation, Alan has advocated for people who have
suffered harm, travelling all over the world to educate people
about this dark subject. He has not averted his gaze. And he
did all this while maintaining his job as a full-time, tenured
law professor and being a devoted husband and an involved
father. While teaching full time and doing consulting work,
Alan earned his MA in Counseling Psychology because he
wanted to learn how psychology was used to benefit people
rather than abuse them.
With his staggering erudition and gravitas, he could have
chosen to focus on any aspect of the law. Instead of following
a conventional route, he stepped off the beaten path
and focused on areas of brainwashing and mind-control
experimentation, which many either denied or scoffed at. As
he explained, “There was a robust literature, but I had to spend
a lot of my time in specialized university libraries to unearth it.”
Most fortunately for those of us who have, unfortunately,
encountered thought-reform techniques, cults, and other
all-too-real horrors, he chose to devote himself to getting
justice for victims. His presence in our lives is invaluable. He is a
national treasure.
Alan Scheflin makes me cry. Tears of gratitude.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Following, Alan shares some thoughts and insights from his
altogether fascinating life:
MO: When did you decide to be a lawyer?
AS: In college. I originally enrolled in engineering courses
because I was good at math and science. But I soon realized
that I wanted a different kind of intellectual challenge, and law
school provided the opportunity to think and help people. I
liked the Socratic Method (unlike most of the other students)
because it forced me to think and to be prepared to argue for
my beliefs. During my final year of college, I had no courses.
I met with individual professors who assigned me to write
a paper a week. Then I had to defend what I wrote in a one-
to-one session with the professor who assigned the paper. I
suppose that’s why law school was so appealing: I had already
had a year of advanced Socratic interactions. In order to
graduate from college, I had to write a thesis, take 11 hours
of comprehensive examinations written by professors from
other schools, and then defend everything I wrote before those
professors, who were brought in to question me in person. It
was simultaneously terrifying and exhilarating. I graduated
with High Honors, one of only four to do so that year. Law
school was much easier because of the education I had
received at college.
MO: What has been the most challenging thing you’ve dealt
with?
AS: Dismay. The realization that so many people needed help,
and the resources to help them were insufficient. I felt like a
polio clinic with only 10 percent of the vaccines available to
protect the victims. It made me sad to realize that doing bad in
this world can be very lucrative, but the efforts to raise money
for good work produces pennies when dollars are needed.
MO: How have you found time to do all you’ve done/do?
AS: I don’t know. I just did what I could do and, over time,
I wound up producing many publications and speaking at
conferences around the world. Intellectually, I loved what I was
doing and emotionally, it was tremendously gratifying to help
people. Because I loved my work, I did not pay much attention
to the time it took to do it.
MO: What motivates you?
AS: I am motivated by helping people in need. To do so, I have
to be the best Alan I can be. What motivates me? There’s still
work that needs to be done.
MO: When dealing with such incredibly dark issues, how do
you keep from being depressed?
With his staggering erudition
and gravitas, he could have
chosen to focus on any aspect of
the law. Instead … he stepped
off the beaten path and focused
on areas of brainwashing and
mind-control experimentation…
ICSA TODAY
AS: I have had to learn to live on the dark side because the
forces of evil are more powerful, and the number of people
needing help grows each year. I have had to reconcile with the
fact that we each can do only what we can, and we can hope
that there are enough of us to make a difference. By the way, I
have never learned to avoid being depressed. What I try to do
is reframe it into working even harder to help.
MO: What issues concern you the most?
AS: I am concerned with the fact that my research started with
government mind control, then went to the private sector, with
cultic issues. Today, a third shift is necessary, as mind-control
research has infected all of our daily lives, especially politics.
Even restaurant menus are victims: There is now a science for
how to prepare a menu so people will buy the most. No part
of our daily lives is unaffected by mental manipulation. We are
all now in a B.F. Skinner box, like it or not. Even worse, we don’t
know it because the forces of manipulation are so carefully
hidden. As for me, however, I’ll stick to what I have been doing:
helping people whose attitudes and beliefs are under assault.
MO: Have there been mistakes you’ve made that you learned
from?
AS: Yes, of course. Too many of them! Every experience
instructs us how to do it better the next time the depression
reminds us of the importance of the work we do.
MO: Do you have hobbies? How do you relax?
AS: I collect movies. I love researching obscure films and
tracking them down. It’s like a never-ending Easter egg hunt.
MO: Did you have a mentor or role model?
AS: I was fortunate to have several mentors. One was a college
professor who first exposed me to the Socratic Method and the
importance of doing one’s own thinking rather than following
the crowd. The second was a law professor named Monroe
Freedman. I encountered him in my first week of school and
he has remained an inspiration for the rest of my life. Monroe
was a Civil Rights lawyer who used the Socratic Method in the
classroom.
Students disliked him and tried to get switched into other
classes because he required them to think and did not simply
tell them what to write down in their notebooks. He taught me
to use my mind and not just carry it around with me. He was
thoroughly dedicated to help the downtrodden. The hours I
spent with him are among the most stellar of my life.
MO: What has been the main goal of your professional life?
AS: To educate and help people to be themselves. We are all
unique, and the one job we have is to protect that uniqueness.
I often think of what they say in airplanes: in the event of an
emergency, put your oxygen mask on first and then help
others. At first, it sounds selfish, but, in fact, it is an important
survival skill for everyone.
MO: Favorite books, music, film…?
AS: Most of my reading is academic. With regard to music:
in California, I was part of a group that met once a month to
share obscure music. I got exposed to artists and music I would
never otherwise have known about. The music cut across many
diverse musical styles, but mostly was “roots” music expressing
the aspirations, desires, and tragedies befalling ordinary
families in a wide diversity of cultures. Where else would I have
heard of Mongolian Throat Singers, or southern Sacred harp
singers?
I like lots of music from the twenties and thirties when blues,
jazz, swing, country, and gospel styles were being created. I
also like the early years of rock music. I was fortunate to spend
time backstage with the rock group Cream during part of their
last tour in the late 1960s. And a dear friend of mine was Roy
Buchanan. Indeed, the Rolling Stones wanted to hire him. Roy
Buchanan was an obscure guitar player often rated as one of
the best. PBS did a documentary about him in 1971, which is
unusual because he was so obscure. But, no one could make
a guitar weep and cry, or soar to the skies, the way he could. I
was honored to write the liner notes for one of his CDs.
MO: Can you say a little about your present family life?
AS: Happy. Mostly healthy. Having moved from California to
New Jersey to be with our extended family, we are mostly
consumed with settling in. Our daughter, Hallie, has a
wonderful job adjacent to the show business world, where
she continues to pursue acting and writing projects. My wife,
Janie, and I have been together for 37 years, and I must say
having a wife who is also my best friend has turned out to be a
wonderful thing for us both. n
...early in his career in the
1960s, he managed to get
copies of writings that had
been smuggled out of the
Soviet Union ...the writings
of dissidents who had been ...
imprisoned in Russian mental
hospitals for the specific
purpose of reprogramming
their minds...
23 VOLUME 11 |ISSUE 1 |2020
4 ICSA TODAY
SPECIAL REPORTS
Note:
References for specific sources cited in Special Reports are
available at icsahome.com/elibrary/icsatoday/references
Report From France and French-Speaking Countries
Catherine Perry
The Loss of MIVILUDES and Controversies Around
Anthroposophy in France
In 1996, the Interministerial Observatory on Cults (Observatoire
interministériel sur les sectes) was established in France. By
presidential decree in November 2002, this agency was
reorganized and attached to the Prime Minister under the
acronym MIVILUDES (Mission interministérielle de vigilance et
de lutte contre les dérives sectaires). The agency’s task has been
to observe, analyze, and combat cultic abuses, in addition to
informing the public and coordinating aid to victims, whose
number is estimated to be at least 500,000.1 The agency
has been run by approximately fifteen interdisciplinary
professionals in the fields of education, health, law, and finance
it also has benefitted from partners in other ministries and a
large network of regional correspondents.
A first harbinger of potential troubles for the agency came
in October 2018, when Serge Blisko, president of MIVILUDES
since August 2012, was not replaced after he retired. Then, on
October 1, 2019, the government announced that MIVILUDES
would be dissolved on January 1, 2020, and merged with the
CIPDR, the Interministerial Committee for the Prevention of
Delinquency and Radicalization (Comité interministériel de
prévention de la délinquance et de la radicalisation), which is
attached to the Ministry of the Interior. Only three to four
officers will remain in the merged organization, and it will
operate with diminished resources.2 The government argues
that this change was prompted by budgetary and restructuring
obligations. But, according to Georges Fenech, president of
MIVILUDES from 2008 to 2012, this decision is “a catastrophe,”
which “has terrible consequences. [MIVILUDES] was envied
by the whole world.”3 Fenech also stated that “[t]his is not
a reorganization it’s a disappearance” resulting from an
“irresponsible” decision by the French government.4
Fenech’s assessment is not without merit. By integrating into
the CIPDR, MIVILUDES will no longer concentrate on cults as
its specific tasks will be absorbed into the fight against Islamic
terrorism. The government’s decision may well reflect an
increasing concern over the dangers of radicalization, which
implies that radicalization has a greater impact on society than
do cultic abuses. Charline Delporte, president of CAFFES, or
the National Center of Family Support and Education against
Cultic Influence (Centre national d’accompagnement familial et
de formation face à l’emprise sectaire), recently observed that
“[t]he fight against cultic abuses is no longer very important in
the eyes of the government,” adding that, “[s]ince 2012, terrorist
attacks have displaced the cursor toward radical Islam, and
we have become secondary.”5 Moreover, Delporte regrets the
impending loss of MIVILUDES’ diversity, as only the policing
division will be left.6
Controversies Around Anthroposophy
There have been some accusatory exchanges in recent French
publications regarding Anthroposophy, Rudolf Steiner, and
Waldorf Schools. Founded in 1912 with the Austrian thinker
and mystic Rudolf Steiner (1861–1925) at its center, the
Anthroposophical Society is a worldwide spiritual, occultist,
philosophical, and social movement that also influences
agriculture, banks, medicine, health products, and at least
1,850 kindergartens and 1,100 schools, called Steiner-Waldorf
schools.7
In his long article for Le Monde diplomatique in July 2018, the
journalist Jean-Baptiste Malet has implied, although he doesn’t
provide hard evidence, that Françoise Nyssen, the former
director of the publishing house Actes Sud, and Minister of
Culture from May 2017 to October 2018, is associated with
Anthroposophy.8 In 2015, according to Malet, Nyssen and
her husband established in Arles what amounts to a Steiner-
Waldorf school, Le Domaine du possible. Though not officially
part of the Steiner-Waldorf educational system, this school was
under the leadership of Henri Dahan, Chief Delegate of the
Federation of Steiner-Waldorf Schools in France until he was
fired from Le Domaine in July 2018. As a student at this school
remarked, “[our] professors say that this isn’t a Steiner school,
but it’s 100% Steiner.”9
Especially in France, which promotes laïcité, or secularism,
Anthroposophy is often considered a cult, even though it
is not officially categorized as such.10 For instance, Nyssen’s
husband, Jean-Paul Capitani, explained that their school’s lack
of denomination resulted from the fact that “in France there are
too many prejudices against spiritualism and against Steiner in
particular.”11 In other words, these schools’ alternative pedagogy
leads to suspicions that they practice a covert proselytism,
and possibly mind control. Before Nyssen’s governmental
appointment in 2017, MIVILUDES was investigating alleged
abuses in Anthroposophical education and medicine. After
Nyssen’s appointment, MIVILUDES ceased its research. In the
words of its former president Serge Blisko, “the Prime Minister’s
cabinet” recommended that MIVILUDES “remain in stand-by” on
the sensitive issue of Anthroposophy.12
NEWS DESK
SPECIAL REPORTS AND NEWS SUMMARIES
VOLUME 11 |ISSUE 1 |2020
Although it remains unclear whether Steiner-Waldorf schools
hide cultic abuses—as other denominational schools can—in
France there have been legal inquiries into some of these
schools. The most recent and noteworthy case implicates a
former Steiner-Waldorf student and Anthroposophist, Grégoire
Perra, who taught philosophy for 4 years in the Steiner-Waldorf
school of Chatou. He resigned from his position in 2007 and
subsequently broke with the French Anthroposophical Society.
In an October 2019 interview, Perra disclosed, “Because I
left this cult on my own, I know it’s not easy. To leave the
nebula of Anthroposophy, when you have built your life
there, is such a nightmare that victims often have trouble
understanding their past.”13 In 2011, he published an article
critiquing Steiner-Waldorf schools for indoctrinating students
to Anthroposophy.14 In 2013, he created a blog, “The Truth
about Steiner-Waldorf Schools and Anthroposophy” (La vérité
sur les écoles Steiner-Waldorf et l’Anthroposophie), in which he
has extensively accused the Steiner-Waldorf pedagogy and
also Anthroposophical medicine for abusive practices.15 So far,
Perra’s writings have triggered three lawsuits: from the Steiner-
Waldorf School Federation, Anthroposophist medical doctors,
and a Waldorf teacher.16 A judgment on 24 May 2013 acquitted
him and the publisher of his 2011 article for good faith.17 A
more recent judgment, on 1 October 2019, also cleared him.18
Grégoire Perra’s accusations have elicited support but also
criticism from scholars of Anthroposophy and the Steiner-
Waldorf system of education. Maria Noland, PhD candidate in
Anthropology and Education at Columbia University, reached
opposite conclusions to Perra’s after studying the Steiner-
Waldorf method of education and corresponding with Perra.19
Chantal Lapointe, in her 2017 doctoral dissertation on Steiner’s
Pedagogy, denounces Perra for being animated by a desire
for revenge 20 it should be noted, however, that Lapointe is a
member of the Canadian Anthroposophical Society.21 Other
scholars do not detect abuses in the Steiner-Waldorf method
of education. See, for instance, Loïc Chalmel,22 or Heiner
Ulrich. who stated in a recent interview with Die Zeit that
“Anthroposophy is not taught in Waldorf schools.”23 In July
2019, the journalist Martin Bernard, who was partly raised in a
Steiner-Waldorf school, revealed documents alleging that Perra
made sexual advances to a 17-year-old female student and
therefore was probably asked to resign from the school where
he taught.24 In one of his blog articles, Perra blames the student
for having attempted to seduce him.25 Whatever the merits of
his insights into current Anthroposophical practices may be,
Perra’s motivations are unclear, and associated controversies
will likely persist.
Report From Poland
Poitr T. Nowakowski
As a consequence of the Parliamentary election held in
Poland on 13 October 2019, Jacek Bury, representing Koalicja
Obywatelska (“Civic Coalition”), the main opposition party,
gained a Senate seat in Lublin. However, some controversies
have arisen around Bury’s past. “The new senator of Koalicja
Obywatelska from Lublin was a co-founder of a community
that has a reputation of a cult,” wrote the nationwide daily
Rzeczpospolita. This reference is about Kościół Nowego
Przymierza (KNP “The Church of New Covenant”), whose
members describe themselves as biblical Christians. The
church’s leader, Pastor Paweł Chojecki, is known from his
Internet television network program, Idź Pod Prąd (“Against the
Tide”), available through YouTube.
For some years, the program’s regular commentator was a
far-right activist, Marian Kowalski, who wrote after leaving the
program in 2018 that “KNP gradually but effectively isolates
its members from families and acquaintances from outside
the group these people are being deprived of privacy and
are subjected to permanent control. Eavesdropping and
denunciatory activities are a daily occurrence.”
The senator-elect has a similar opinion. “It [KNP] is de facto
a cult. Manipulating people, hooking them on the group,
monopoly on the truth, monopoly on decisions: These are
features of a cult,” enumerates Bury as quoted by the daily.
How did Bury become involved in KNP? There were things in
the organization of the Catholic Church he couldn’t accept, so
he started to “seek the truth” in a somewhat broader context.
In this way, he got to know all protestant churches, including
that of Paweł Chojecki. While studying, both men established
Wspólnota Chrześcijańską Pojednanie (“Christian Community
Reconciliation”). Bury also confirmed that his name appeared
later, in the registration documents of KNP in 1997 however, he
points out that he left the community after some months when
he realized that it had taken on the traits of a cult.
Chojecki presents a slightly different history of the mutual
relationship. According to him, even though Senator Bury was
a member of KNP for about a year, they collaborated closely
in one of the communities for 11 years. Chojecki added that
Bury was an important figure in KNP and “belonged to a group
of decision makers.” Chojecki’s television program alleges that
Bury “ostentatiously distorts the reality” by marginalizing a
long-time collaboration. The pastor finds accusations of the
church being a cult deeply unfair. “For many people in Poland,
membership in a non-Catholic Church equals cultic affiliation,”
he argues.
Report From Spain and Latin America
Luis Santamaría
Translated by Erika Toren and John Paul Lennon
Groups of Asian Origin
In August 2019, Uruguay’s Department of Organized Crime
decided to shelve the prosecutor’s petition to investigate a
yoga teacher for an alleged human-trafficking case. The name
of the accused is Octav Fercheluc, the manager at the Academia
de Yoga Tradicional Ananda in Montevideo, an affiliate of the
Movement for Spiritual Integration into the Absolute (MISA,
Romanian acronym). The complaint that originated the petition
stated that Fercheluc was preparing a trip with four students to
2527
Previous Page Next Page